A Commonplace Problem: Uncovering Composition’s Tacit Axiologies of Reading

References

1. Adler-Kassner Linda, and Estrem Heidi. “Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing: A View from the Field.” The Outcomes Book edited by Harrington Susanmarie et al., Utah State UP 2005, pp 60–71.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adler-Kassner Linda, and Estrem Heidi. “Reading Practices in the Writing Classroom.” WPA: Writing Program Administration - Journal of the Council of Writing Program Administrators, vol. 31, no. 1/2 2007, pp 35–47.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Allington Richard L. Foreword. Readicide: How Schools Are Killing Reading and What You Can Do About It, by Gallagher Kelly, Stenhouse 2009 pp vii–viii.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anson Chris. “Writing to Read, Revisited.” What Is College Reading? edited by Horning Alice et al., The WAC Clearinghouse and UP of Colorado 2017, pp 21–39.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bakhtin Mikhail. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays edited by Holquist Michael and translated by Emerson Caryl, U of Texas P 1981.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bartholomae David. “Inventing the University.” Journal of Basic Writing, vol. 5, no. 1 1986, pp 4–23.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bartholomae David et al. Ways of Reading: An Anthology for Writers. Bedford/St Martins 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bazerman Charles. “A Relationship between Reading and Writing: The Conversational Model.” College English, vol. 41, no. 6 1980, pp 656–61.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bean John C., et al. Reading Rhetorically, 4th ed., Pearson 2014.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Beaufort Anne. College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework for University Writing Instruction. Utah State UP 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Beaufort Anne. “Developmental Gains of a History Major: A Case for Building a Theory of Disciplinary Writing Expertise.” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 39, no. 2 2004, pp 136–85.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Berlin James A. Rhetoric and Reality: Writing Instruction in American Colleges, 1900-1985. Southern Illinois UP 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bird Barbara, et al. editors Next Steps: New Directions for/in Writing about Writing. Utah State UP 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Block Cathy Collins, and Duffy Gerald. “Research on Teaching Comprehension: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going.” Comprehension Instruction: Research-based Best Practices edited by Block Cathy Collins and Parris Sheri R, The Guilford Press 2008, pp 19–37.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bosley L. “I Don’t Teach Reading: Critical Reading Instruction in Composition Courses.” Literacy Research and Instruction, vol. 47, no. 4 2008, pp 285–308.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Brent Doug. Reading as Rhetorical Invention: Knowledge, Persuasion, and the Teaching of Research-Based Writing. National Council of Teachers of English 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bruffee Kenneth A. “Collaborative Learning and the ‘Conversation of Mankind.’” College English, vol. 46, no. 7 1984, pp 635–52.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Burke Kenneth. The Philosophy of Literary Form. U of California P 1941.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Carillo Ellen C. “Creating Mindful Readers in First-Year Composition Courses: A Strategy to Facilitate Transfer.” Pedagogy, vol, 16, no 1 2016, pp 9–22.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Carillo Ellen C. MLA Guide to Digital Literacy. MLA 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Carillo Ellen C. Securing a Place for Reading in Composition: The Importance of Teaching for Transfer. Utah State UP 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Carillo Ellen C. Teaching Readers in Post-Truth America. UP of Colorado 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Carmichael Felicita Arzu. “Teaching Anti-Racist Reading Practices in First-Year Writing.” Writing Program Administration, vol. 44, no. 3 2021, pp 138–45.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Carter Michael. “Ways of Knowing Doing, and Writing in the Disciplines.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 58, no. 3 2007, pp 385–418.
    [Google Scholar]
25. “CCCC Position Statement on the Role of Reading in College Writing Classrooms.” Conference on College Composition and Communication. March 2021, https://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/the-role-of-reading.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Charlton Jonnika. “Seeing Is Believing: Writing Studies with ‘Basic Writing’ Students.” BWe: Basic Writing E-Journal 2009, vol 8–9, pp. 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Cohn Jenae. Skim, Dive, Surface: Teaching Digital Reading. West Virginia UP 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Connors Robert J. “Textbooks and the Evolution of the Discipline.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 37, no. 2 1986, pp 178–94.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Corrigan Paul T. “Attending to the Act of Reading: Critical Reading, Contemplative Reading, and Active Reading.” Essays in Reader-Oriented Theory, Criticism, and Pedagogy, vol. 63 2012, pp 146–73.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Crowley Sharon, and Hawhee Debra. Ancient Rhetoric for Contemporary Students, 3rd ed. Pearson Education 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Downs Doug. “Teaching First Year Writers to Use Texts: Scholarly Readings in Writing-about-Writing in First Year Comp.” Reader: Essays in Reader-Oriented Theory, Criticism, and Pedagogy, no. 60 2010, pp 19–50.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Fish Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Harvard UP 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Fulkerson Richard. “Composition at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 56, no. 4 2005, pp 654–87.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Geisler Cheryl L. Academic Literacy and the Nature of Expertise: Reading, Writing, and Knowing in Academic Philosophy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Giordano Baird Joanne , and Smith Cheryl Hogue. “The Changing Realities of Open-Access Reading: Where Are We Now? Where Might We Go Next?” Special issue of Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol. 50, no. 2 2022, pp 109–15.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Graff Gerald, and Birkenstein Cathy. They Say, I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing. W.W. Norton 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Haas Christina. “Learning to Read in Biology: One Student’s Rhetorical Development in College.” Written Communication, vol. 11, no. 1 1994, pp 43–84.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Haas Christina, and Flower Linda. “Rhetorical Reading Strategies and the Construction of Meaning.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 39, no. 2 1988, pp 167–83.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Harkin Patricia. “The Reception of Reader-Response Theory.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 56, no. 3 2005, pp 410–25.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Harris Joseph. Rewriting: How to Do Things with Texts. 2nd ed., Utah State UP 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Helmers Marguerite H. Intertexts: Reading Pedagogy in College Writing Classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Horning Alice, and Kraemer Elizabeth W. Reconnecting Reading and Writing. Parlor P and WAC Clearinghouse 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Ihara Rachel, and Principe Ann Del. “What We Mean When We Talk about Reading: Rethinking the Purposes and Contexts of College Reading.” Across the Disciplines: A Journal of Language, Learning and Academic Writing, vol. 15, no. 2 2018 pp 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Inoue Asao. “Teaching Antiracist Reading.” Journal of College Reading and Learning, vol. 50, no. 3 2020, pp 134–56.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Iser Wolfgang. “The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach.” New Literary History, vol. 3, no. 2 1972, pp 279–99.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Jordan Jay. “Rereading the Multicultural Reader: Towards More ‘Infectious’ Practices in Multicultural Composition.” College English, vol. 68, no. 2 2005, pp 168–85.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Keller Daniel. Chasing Literacy: Reading and Writing in an Age of Acceleration. Utah State UP 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Keller Daniel. “A Framework for Rereading in First-Year Composition.” Teaching English in the Two Year College, vol. 41, no. 1 2013, pp 44–55.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Knoblauch A. Abby. “A Textbook Argument: Definitions of Argument in Leading Composition Textbooks.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 63, no. 2 2011, pp 244–68.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Lunsford Andrea A., et al. Everyone’s an Author. Norton 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
51. McComiskey Bruce. Post-Truth Rhetoric and Composition. UP of Colorado 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Miller Susan. “‘Is There a Text in This Class?’” Freshman English News, vol. 11, no. 1 1982, pp 20–24.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Rheingold Howard. Net smart: How to thrive online. MIT Press 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Rosenblatt Louise. “The Transactional Theory of Reading and Writing.” Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 4th ed. edited by Ruddell Robert et al. International Reading Association 1994 pp 1057–92.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Salvatori Mariolina. “Conversations with Texts: Reading in the Teaching of Composition.” College English, vol. 58, no. 4 1996, pp 440–54.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Salvatori Mariolina Rizzo, and Donahue Patricia. “Guest Editors’ Introduction.” Pedagogy, vol. 16, no. 1 2015 pp 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Salvatori Mariolina Rizzo, and Donahue Patricia. “Stories about Reading: Appearance, Disappearance, Morphing, and Revival.” College English, vol. 75, no. 2 2012, pp 199–217.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Shanahan Cynthia, et al. “Analysis of Expert Readers in Three Disciplines: History, Mathematics, and Chemistry.” Journal of Literacy Research, vol. 43, no. 4 2011, 393–429.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Sullivan Patrick. “‘Deep Reading’ as a Threshold Concept in Composition Studies.” Deep Reading: Teaching Reading in the Writing Classroom edited by Sullivan Patrick et al. National Council of Teachers of English 2017, pp 143–71.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Sullivan Patrick, et al. Deep Reading, Deep Learning. Peter Lang Verlag 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Sullivan Patrick, et al. “Introduction.” Deep Reading: Teaching Reading in the Writing Classroom edited by Sullivan Patrick et al. National Council of Teachers of English 2017, pp xiii–xxvii.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Sweeney Meghan A., and McBride Maureen. “Difficulty Paper (Dis)Connections: Understanding the Threads Students Weave between Their Reading and Writing.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 66, no. 4 2015, pp 591–614.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Traester Mary, et al. “Pedagogy to Disrupt the Echo Chamber: Digital Annotation as Critical Community to Promote Active Reading.” Pedagogy, vol. 21, no. 2 2021, pp 329–49.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Wardle Elizabeth, and Downs Doug. Writing About Writing. 4th ed. Bedford/St Martins 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Welch Kathleen E. “Ideology and Freshman Textbook Production: The Place of Theory in Writing Pedagogy.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 38, no. 3 1987, pp 269–82.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Wineburg Samuel, “On the Reading of Historical Texts: Notes on the Breach between School and Academy.” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 28, no. 3 1991, pp 495–519.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Wineburg Samuel, and McGrew Sarah. “Lateral Reading and the Nature of Expertise: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluating Digital Information.” Teachers College Record, vol. 121, no. 11 2019, pp 1–40.
    [Google Scholar]
68. “WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition (Revisions Adopted 17 July, 2014).” WPA: Writing Program Administration, vol. 38, no. 1 2014, pp 144–48.
    [Google Scholar]
69. A WPA Roundtable: Implementing Program-Wide Writing Studies-Based Composition Pedagogies. Writing about Writing Network, 23 Mar. 2021. https://writingaboutwriting.net/2021/03/23/a-wpa-roundtable-implementing-program-wide-writing-studies-based-composition-pedagogies/. Accessed 12 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]