Skip to content
2018
Volume 76, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0010-096X
  • E-ISSN: 1939-9006

Abstract

This research team sought to gauge potential changes in the composition landscape by replicating, diversifying, and extending Bergmann and Zepernick’s 2007 study. To potentially measure the impact of years of transfer-focused work, we examined participants’ perceptions of first-year writing (FYW) classes at multiple institutions and in multiple fields at four diverse institutions. Gathering data from thirteen focus groups and sixteen interviews, the study included sixty-four total participants at four universities across the United States. Our findings diverged from the original study. The results indicated students felt that FYW was both personal and academic; that FYW taught students how to write; that FYW instructors were experts in their field; that FYW teaches best writing processes and practices; that personally relevant writing is important to writing transfer; and that for writing, there is “no box under the bed.” These findings suggest that transfer curricula may be working in tandem with other approaches, such as Writing about Writing, to shift students’ perceptions of the importance of FYW.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ccc2024761149
2024-09-01
2026-03-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adler-Kassner Linda, and Wardle Elizabeth editors “Naming What We Know: The Project of This Book.” Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts in Writing Studies. Utah State UP 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anson Chris M., and Moore Jessie L. editors Critical Transitions: Writing and the Question of Transfer. The WAC Clearinghouse 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Artemeva Natasha. “Key Concepts in Rhetorical Genre Studies: An Overview.” Canadian Journal for Studies in Discourse and Writing/Redactologie, vol. 20, no. 1 2004, pp 3–38, https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.524.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bazerman Charles, et al. “Taking the Long View on Writing Development.” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 51, no. 3 2017, pp 351–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beaufort Anne. College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework for University Writing Instruction. Utah State UP 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beaufort Anne. “College Writing and Beyond: Five Years Later.” Composition Forum, vol. 26 2012, pp 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5463/ejlw.7.258.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Beaufort Anne. Writing in the Real World: Making the Transition from School to Work. Teachers College P 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bergmann Linda S, and Zepernick Janet. “Disciplinarity and Transfer: Students’ Perceptions of Learning to Write.” Writing Program Administration, vol. 31, no. 1–2 2007, pp 124–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark Irene. “A Genre Approach to Writing Assignments.” Composition Forum, vol. 14, no. 2 2005 https://compositionforum.com/issue/14.2/clark-genre-writing.php.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Connors Robert J., and Lunsford Andrea A. “Frequency of Formal Errors in Current College Writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle Do Research.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 39, no. 4 1988, pp 395–409. https://doi.org/10.2307/357695.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Downs Douglas, and Wardle Elizabeth. “Teaching about Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning ‘First-Year Composition’ as ‘Introduction to Writing Studies.’” College Composition and Communication, vol. 58, no. 4 2007, pp 552–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Driscoll Dana L. “Connected, Disconnected, or Uncertain: Student Attitudes about Future Writing Contexts and Perceptions of Transfer from First Year Writing to the Disciplines.” Across the Disciplines, vol. 8, no. 2 2011, pp 1–29, https://doi.org/10.37514/atd-j.2011.8.2.07.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Driscoll Dana L., and Wells Jennifer. “Beyond Knowledge and Skills: Writing Transfer and the Role of Student Dispositions.” Composition Forum, vol. 26 2012, https://compositionforum.com/issue/26/beyond-knowledge-skills.php.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Driscoll Dana L., and Powell Roger L. “States, Traits, and Dispositions: The Impact of Emotion on Writing Development and Writing Transfer across College Courses and Beyond.” Composition Forum, vol. 34 2016, https://compositionforum.com/issue/34/states-traits.php.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Driscoll Dana Lynn, et al. “Genre Knowledge and Writing Development: Results From the Writing Transfer Project.” Written Communication, vol. 37, no. 1 2020, pp 69–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319882313.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. “Elon Statement On Writing Transfer.” Center for Engaged Learning, 29 July 2013, https://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/elon_statement_writing_transfer.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Eodice Michele, et al. The Meaningful Writing Project: Learning, Teaching, and Writing in Higher Education. UP of Colorado, 2016. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kc6hjg. Accessed 28 Aug 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Field-Rothschild Katherine. “Research as Inquiry: Teaching Questioning in FYC for Research Skills Transfer.” Teaching Information Literacy and Writing Studies: First-Year Composition Courses edited by Veach Grace, vol. 1, Purdue UP 2018, pp 85–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fraizer Dan. “First Steps Beyond First Year: Coaching Transfer After FYC.” Writing Program Administration, vol. 33, no. 3 2010, pp 34–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gorzelsky Gwen, et al. “Cultivating Constructive Metacognition: A New Taxonomy for Writing Studies.” Critical Transitions: Writing and the Question of Transfer edited by Anson Chris M. and Moore Jessie L., WAC Clearinghouse 2017, pp 215–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hayes Carol, et al. “Adapting Writing about Writing: Curricular Implications of Cross-Institutional Data from the Writing Transfer Project.” Writing Program Administration, vol. 41, no. 2 2018, pp 65–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Herman Daniel. “The End of HighSchool English.” The Atlantic. 9 Dec 2022 https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/openai-chatgpt-writing-high-school-english-essay/672412/.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Herrington Anne J., and Curtis Marcia. Persons in Process: Four Stories of Writing and Personal Development in College. Refiguring English Studies Series. National Council of Teachers of English 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hill Christopher, et al. “An Investigation into the Learning Transfer of English for Specific Academic Purposes (ESAP) Writing Skills of Students in Singapore,” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 48, article 100908 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McCarthy Lucille P. “A Stranger in Strange Lands: A College Student Writing Across the Curriculum.” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 21, no. 3 1987, pp 233–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nelms Gerald, and Dively Ronda L.. “Perceived Roadblocks to Transferring Knowledge from First-Year Composition to Writing-Intensive Major Courses: A Pilot Study.” Writing Program Administration, vol. 31, no. 1–2 2007, pp 214–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nowacek Rebecca S. Agents of Integration: Understanding Transfer as a Rhetorical Act. Southern Illinois UP 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Perkins David N., and Salomon Gavriel. “Teaching for Transfer.” Educational Leadership, vol. 46, no. 1 1998, pp 22–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Powell Roger L., and Driscoll Dana L. “How Mindsets Shape Response and Learning Transfer: A Case of Two Graduate Writers.” Journal of Response to Writing, vol. 6, no. 2 2021, pp 42–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Raucci John. “A Replication Agenda for Composition Studies.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 72, no. 3 2021, pp 440–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Reiff Mary J., and Bawarshi Anis. “Tracing Discursive Resources: How Students Use Prior Genre Knowledge to Negotiate New Writing Contexts in First-Year Composition.” Written Communication, vol. 28, no. 3 2011, pp 312–36, https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311410183.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Robertson Liane, et al. “Notes Toward a Theory of Prior Knowledge and Its Role in College Composers’ Transfer of Knowledge and Practice.” Composition Forum, vol. 26 2012, http://compositionforum.com/issue/26/prior-knowledge-transfer.php.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rothschild Katherine. “I Was a Writer, Even If Teachers Brought Me Down”: The Impact of WID-Oriented Curriculum on Students’ Writerly Identity Development 2020 Indiana University of Pennsylvania, PhD dissertation. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rothschild Katherine. “Responding to Writerly Identity as Inclusive Pedagogy,” Journal of Response to Writing, vol. 9, no. 2, article 4 2023 https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/journalrw/vol9/iss2/4.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sternglass Marilyn S. “Commitment to Writing and Complexity of Thinking.” Journal of Basic Writing, vol. 5, no. 1 1986, pp 77–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Taczak Kara. “Reflection Is Critical for Writers’ Development.” Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies edited by Adler-Kassner Linda and Wardle Elizabeth, UP of Colorado 2015, pp 78–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tinberg Howard. “Teaching for Transfer: A Passport for Writing in New Contexts.” Peer Review, vol. 19, no. 1 2017, pp 17–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Tremain Lisa D. “I Feel Confident Most of the Time”: A Study of the Relationships Between Writing Transfer, Dispositions Toward Learning and Writing, and Perceptions of Classroom Contexts. University of California, Santa Barbara 2015 PhD dissertation. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wardle Elizabeth. “Understanding ‘Transfer’ from FYC: Preliminary Results of a Longitudinal Study.” WPA Journal, vol. 31, no. 1–2 2007, pp 65–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wardle Elizabeth, and Downs Douglas editors Writing about Writing: A College Reader. 2nd ed., Bedford/St. Martin’s 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yancey Kathleen B., et al. Writing Across Contexts: Transfer, Composition, and Sites of Writing. Utah State UP 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc2024761149
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc2024761149
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test