Acts of Recognition: A Study of Faculty Writers’ Experiences of Engaging Peer Review

References

1. Andrews Lorraine, et al. “Classic Grounded Theory to Analyse Secondary Data: Reality and Reflection.” Grounded Theory Review, vol. 11, no. 1 2012 http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2012/06/01/classic-grounded-theory-to-analyse-secondary-data-reality-and-reflections/.
   [Google Scholar]
2. “Anti-Racist Scholarly Reviewing Practices: A Heuristic for Editors, Reviewers, and Authors” 2021 https://tinyurl.com/reviewheuristic.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arrington Phillip. “Some Thoughts on Changing the Review Process for Academic Journals: A Personal Exploration.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 13, no. 2 1995, pp 249–53.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ballenger Bruce, and Myers Kelly. “The Emotional Work of Revision.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 70, no. 4 2019, pp 590–614.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Beare Zachary C., and Stenberg Shari J.. “‘Everyone Thinks It’s Just Me’: Exploring the Emotional Dimensions of Seeking Publication.” College English, vol. 83, no. 2 2020, pp 103–26.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Berkenkotter Carol. “The Power and the Perils of Peer Review.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 13, no. 2 1995, pp 245–48.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bingham Charles. Schools of Recognition: Identity Politics and Classroom Practices. Rowman & Littlefield 2001.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brammer Charlotte, and Rees Mary. “Peer Review from the Students’ Perspective: Invaluable or Invalid.” Composition Studies, vol. 35, no. 2 2007, pp 71–85.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Buber Martin. The Knowledge of Man. George Allen & Unwin 1965.
   [Google Scholar]
10. “Cognition - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms.” Vocabulary.com. https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/cognition.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Corder Jim W. “Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 4, no. 1 1985, pp 16–32.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dali Keren, and Jaeger Paul T.. “Beyond Scholarly Publishing: The Human Dimension of Peer Review in LIS.” The Library Quarterly, vol. 88, no. 2 2018, pp 99–124.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fontaine Sheryl I. “With Writers’ Eyes: Perception and Change in Manuscript Review Procedures.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 13, no. 2 1995, pp 259–64.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gebhardt Richard C. “Refereed Publication in Composition Studies and CCC.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 13, no. 2 1995, pp 238–44.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Glaser Barney G. “The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis.” Social Problems, vol. 12, no. 4 1965, pp 436–45.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Glaser Barney G. The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. Sociology P 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hunter Susan. “The Case for Reviewing as Collaboration and Response.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 265–72.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kroll Barry M. “Arguing Differently.” Pedagogy, vol. 5, no. 1 2005, pp 37–60.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Langley Ann. “Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data.” Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, no. 4 1999, pp 691–710.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Qualley Donna. Turns of Thought: Teaching Composition as Reflexive Inquiry. Boynton/Cook 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ratcliffe Krista. “Rhetorical Listening: A Trope for Interpretive Invention and a ‘Code of Cross-Cultural Conduct.’” College Composition and Communication, vol. 51, no. 2 1999, pp 195–224.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Rogers Carl. R. “Communication: Its Blocking and Its Facilitation.” ETC: A Review of General Semantics, vol. 9, no. 2 1952, pp 83–88.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sakai Naoki. “Translation.” Theory, Culture, & Society, vol. 23, no. 2-3 2006, pp 71–78.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Saldaña Johnny. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3rd ed., Sage Publications 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Selfe Cynthia L., and Hawisher Gail E.. “Methodologies of Peer and Editorial Review: Changing Practices.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 63, no. 4 2012, pp 672–98.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Soderlund Lars, and Wells Jaclyn. “A Study of the Practices and Responsibilities of Scholarly Peer Review in Rhetoric and Composition.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 71, no. 1 2019, pp 117–44.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Weiser Irwin. “Peer Review in the Tenure and Promotion Process.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 63, no. 4 2012, pp 645–72.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Wiederhold Eve. “Translating (Within) the Spaces Between Rhetoric and Composition.” Enculturation, vol. 5, no. 2 2004 http://enculturation.net/5_2/wiederhold.html.
    [Google Scholar]