Skip to content
2018
Volume 75, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0010-096X
  • E-ISSN: 1939-9006

Abstract

This paper tells the story of the , the Mesopotamian scribal school. First, the ’s pedagogy demonstrates that the first formalized center for teaching writing was more akin to the modern writing center than to the composition classroom. Second, unlike many modern writing centers, the was multilingual. It is easy to look at the past and congratulate ourselves on how much better we’ve made the future, but the has something to teach us beyond the fact that it preceded the composition classroom. A circle has no beginning, and both the writing center and the writing classroom are part of one circle—equally important to the students they serve.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ccc2023752418
2023-12-01
2026-06-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alster Bendt. “Paradoxical Proverbs and Satire in Sumerian Literature.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies, vol. 27, no. 4 1975, pp 201–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bazerman Charles, et al. editors International Advances in Writing Research: Cultures, Places, Measures. WAC Clearinghouse / Parlor Press 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Besnier Marie-Francoise. The Geography of Knowledge Project. University of Pennsylvania 2014 Accessed July 2021. http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/cams/gkab/P338688.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Black J. A., et al. “A Praise Poem of Shulgi (Shulgi B): Translation.” The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature. University of Oxford, 1998–2006. https://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/section2/tr24202.htm. Accessed 22 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boquet Elizabeth H. Noise from the Writing Center. UP of Colorado 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bower Virginia, et al. “The Writing Center: Past and Present.” Tutor.edu: A Manual for Writing Center Tutors, 19 July 2000 http://www.montreat.edu/tutor/1-1.htm.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bratta Phil, and Powell Malea. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Entering the Cultural Rhetorics Conversations.” Enculturation, 20 Apr 2016 http://enculturation.net/entering-the-cultural-rhetorics-conversations.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brauer Gerd. “Drawing Connections across Education: The Frieberg Writing Center Model.” Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, vol. 5, no. 3 2002, pp 61–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bromley Pam, and Scott Andrea. “The State of Writing Center Research across the Atlantic: A Bibliometric Analysis of a German Flagship Journal, 2010-2016.” Praxis: A Writing Center Journal, vol. 17, no. 2 2020, pp 68–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Canagarajah Suresh. “Translingual Writing and Teacher Development in Composition.” College English, vol. 78, no. 3 2016, pp 265–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Carino Peter. “What Do We Talk about When We Talk about Our Metaphors: A Cultural Critique of Clinic, Lab, and Center.” Writing Center Journal, vol. 13, no. 1 1992, pp 31–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Caswell Nicole I., et al. The Working Lives of New Writing Center Directors. UP of Colorado 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Charpin Dominique. Reading and Writing Babylon. Harvard UP 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohen Yoram, and Kedar Sivan. “Teacher-Student Relationships: Two Case Studies.” The Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture edited by Radner Karen and Robson Eleanor, Oxford UP 2011, pp 230–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cristomos C. Jay “Writing Sumerian, Creating Texts: Reflections on TextBuilding Practices in Old Babylonian Schools.” Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions, vol. 15, no. 2 2016, pp 121–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Croft John D. “Sumer, Akkad, and Elam” 2008Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sumer3.jpg.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. De Herder William. “Composing the Center: History, Networks, Design, and Writing Center Work.” Praxis: A Writing Center Journal, vol. 15, no. 3 2018, pp 6–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Delnero Paul. Email to the author. 3 Apr 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Delnero Paul. “Sumerian Extract Tablets and Scribal Education.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies, vol. 62 2010, pp 53–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Denny Harry C. Facing the Center: Toward an Identity Politics of One-to-One Mentorship. UP of Colorado 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Denny Harry, et al. Out in the Center: Public Controversies and Private Struggles. UP of Colorado 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Donahue Christiane. “‘Internationalization’ and Composition Studies: Reorienting the Discourse.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 61, no. 2 2009, pp 212–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Emerson Lisa, et al. “Writing in a New Zealand Tertiary Context: WAC and Action Research.” Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, vol. 5, no. 3 2002, pp 110–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ETCSLtranslation: t.6.1.02. Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature. 19 Dec 2006 https://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/etcsl.cgi?text=t.6.1.02#.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Geller Anne Ellen, et al. The Everyday Writing Center. UP of Colorado 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. George A. R. “In Search of the é.dub.ba.a: The Ancient Mesopotamian School in Literature and Reality.” “An Experienced Scribe Who Neglects Nothing”: Ancient Near Eastern Studies in Honor of Jacob Klein edited by Sefati Yitschak et al., CDL Press 2005, pp 127–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Halton Charles, and Svard Saana editors Women’s Writing of Ancient Mesopotamia. Cambridge UP 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Harris Rivkah. “Biographical Notes on the Naditu Women of Sippar.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies, vol. 16, no. 1 1962, pp 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Harris Rivkah. “The Naditu Woman.” Studies Presented to Leo A. Oppenheim, edited by Briggs R. D., and Binkerman J. A., U of Chicago P 1964, pp 106–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hodges Amy, et al. “Learning from/in Middle East and North Africa Writing Centers: Negotiating Access and Diversity.” Writing Center Journal, vol. 37, no. 2 2019, pp 43–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Horner Bruce, et al. “Opinion: Language Difference in Writing: Toward a Translingual Approach.” College English, vol. 73, no. 3 2011, pp 303–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Horner Bruce, et al. “Toward a Multilingual Composition Scholarship: From English Only to a Translingual Norm. College Composition and Communication, vol. 63, no. 2 2011, pp 269–300.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kennedy George A. Comparative Rhetoric: An Historical and Cross-Cultural Introduction. Oxford UP 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kiedaisch Jean, and Dinitz Sue. “Changing Notions of Difference in the Writing Center: The Possibility of Universal Design.” Writing Center Journal, vol. 7, no. 2 2007, pp 39–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kramer Samuel Noah. History Begins at Sumer: Thirty-Nine Firsts in Recorded History. U of Pennsylvania P 1981.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kramer Samuel Noah. “Schooldays: A Sumerian Composition Relating to the Education of a Scribe.” Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol. 69, no. 4 1949, pp 199–215.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lerner Neal. The Idea of a Writing Laboratory. Southern Illinois UP 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lu Min-Zhan, and Horner Bruce. “Introduction: Translingual Work.” College English, vol. 78, no. 3 2016, pp 207–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Mao LuMing. Reading Chinese Fortune Cookie: The Making of Chinese American Rhetoric. UP of Colorado 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Marcovich Anne, and Shinn Terry. “Regimes of Science Production and Diffusion: Towards a Transverse Organization of Knowledge.” Scientific Studies, vol. 10 2012, pp 33–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Matsuda Paul Kei, et al. editors Bridging the Disciplinary Divide: Integrating a Second-Language Perspective into Writing Programs, special issue of WPA: Writing Program Administration, vol. 30, nos. 1-2 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. McKinney Jackie Grutsch. Peripheral Visions for Writing Centers. UP of Colorado 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Meier Samuel. “Women and Communication in the Ancient Near East.” Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol. 111, no. 3 1991, pp 540–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Monroe Jonathan. “Global Cultures, Local Writing: Collaborative Contexts: The Cornell Consortium for Writing in the Disciplines.” WAC in International Contexts, special issue of Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, vol. 5, no. 3 2002, pp 11–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Monty Randall W. The Writing Center as Cultural and Interdisciplinary Contact Zone. Palgrave MacMillan 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Muchiri Mary N., et al. “Importing Composition: Teaching and Researching Academic Writing beyond North America.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 46, no. 2 1995, pp 175–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Oppenheim A. Leo. Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization. U of Chicago P 1964.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Oppenheim A. Leo. Letters from Mesopotamia: Official, Business, and Private Letters on Clay Tablets from Two Millenia. U of Chicago P 1967.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Ogulnick Karen editor Language Crossings: Negotiating the Self in a Multicultural World. Teachers College Press 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Pearce Laurie E. “The Scribes and Scholars of Ancient Mesopotamia.” Civilizations of the Ancient Near East, vol. 4 edited by Sasson Jack, Sons Charles Scribner’s 1995, pp 2265–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Powell Malea. “Rhetorics of Survivance. How American Indians Use Writing.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 53, no. 3 2002, pp 396–434.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Powell Malea, et al. “Our Story Begins Here: Constellating Cultural Rhetorics.” Enculturaton, 25 Oct 2014 http://enculturation.net/our-story-begins-here. Accessed 24 Jan. 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Raign Kathryn Rosser. “Creating Verbal Immediacy: Use of Immediacy and Avoidance Techniques in Online Tutorials.” Praxis, vol. 10, no. 2 2013 http://www.praxisuwc.com/raign-102.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Raign Kathryn Rosser. “Finding Our Missing Pieces: Women Technical Writers in Ancient Mesopotamia.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, vol. 49, no. 3 2019, pp 338–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Ratcliffe Krista. “The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries.” The Present State of Scholarship in the History of Rhetoric: A Twenty-First Century Guide edited by Gaillet Lynee Lewis and Horner Winifred Bryan, U of Missouri P 2010, pp 185–212.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Robson Eleanor. “The Tablet House: A Scribal School in Old Babylonian Nippur.” Revue d’Assyriologie et d’Archeologie Orientale [Journal of Assyriology and Oriental Archeology], vol. 93, no. 1 2001, pp 39–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Royster Jacqueline Jones, and Kirsch Gesa E. Feminist Rhetorical Practices: New Horizons for Rhetoric, Composition, and Literacy Studies. Southern Illinois UP 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Scott Andrea. “Re-Centering Writing Center Studies: What U.S.-Based Scholars Can Learn from Their Colleagues in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.” Zeitschrift Schreiben [European Journal of Writing], vol. 28 2016 https://zeitschrift-schreiben.ch/globalassets/zeitschrift-schreiben.eu/2016/scott_writing centerstudies.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Sjoberg A. W. “The Old Babylonian Eduba.” Sumerological Studies in Honor of Thorkild Jacobsen on His Seventieth Birthday, June 7 1974, edited by Lieberman S. J., U of Chicago P, 1975, pp. 159–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Stapleton Paul. “Assessing Critical Thinking in the Writing of Japanese University Students: Insights about Assumptions and Content Familiarity.” Written Communication, vol. 18 2001, pp 506–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Taylor Irving, and Finkel Jonathan. Cuneiform. Getty 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Tetlow Elizabeth. Women, Crime, and Punishment in Ancient Law and Society. Continuum 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Thaiss Chris, et al. editors Writing Programs Worldwide: Profiles of Academic Writing in Many Places. WAC Clearinghouse / Parlor Press 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Townsend Marty. “Writing in/across the Curriculum at a Comprehensive Chinese University.” WAC in International Contexts, special issue of Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, vol. 5, no. 3 2002, pp 134–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Vanstiphout Herman. “The Dialogue Between a Supervisor and a Scribe.” The Context of Scripture, vol. 1 edited by Hallo William H., Brill 2003, pp 590–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Vanstiphout Herman. “The Dialogue between Two Scribes (1.184).” The Context of Scripture, vol. 1 edited by Hallo William H., Brill 2003, pp 589–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Vanstiphout Herman. Epics of Sumerian Kings: The Matter of Aratta edited by Cooper Jerrold S., Society of Biblical Literature 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. You Xiaoye. “Globalization and the Politics of Teaching EFL Writing.” The Politics of Second Language Writing: In Search of the Promised Land edited by Matsuda Paul Kei et al., Parlor Press 2006, pp 188–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Zamazalová Silvie. “The Sumerian language.” The Nimrud Project at Oracc. org, 8 Dec 2019, http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/nimrud/ancientkalhu/thewritings/sumerian/.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc2023752418
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc2023752418
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test