Toward Disruptive Agency

References

1. Ahmed Sara. On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Duke UP 2012.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahmed Sara. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Others Objects. Duke UP 2006.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ALOK [@alokvmenon]. “#2020YearIn Review post about self-reflexivity, compassion, vulnerability, and healing.” Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CJbmxp6hldP/. Accessed July 9 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anti-Racism Daily. “About.” Anti-Racism Daily. https://subscribe.the-ard.com/about. Accessed December 8 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Anti-Racism Daily [@ARDTakeAction]. “Help Puerto Rico Recover from Hurricane Fiona.” Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CistsWpOaD1/. Accessed December 8 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Anti-Racism Daily [@ARDTakeAction]. “Housing Is a Human Right.” Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/Ci8TbtuOV84/. Accessed December 8 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Anti-Racism Daily [@ARDTakeAction]. “What Is Hostile Architecture? ” Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CiSpxlXrnWh/. Accessed December 8 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Arola Kristin L., and Rickert Thomas J. “Conversations toward a Future New Materialism across Boundaries.” Gries et al., pp. 190–98.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Barad Karen. “Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart.” Parallax, vol. 20, no. 3 2014, pp 168–87.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Barad Karen. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 28, no. 3 2003, pp 801–31.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bastian Heather. “Capturing Individual Uptake: Toward a Disruptive Research Methodology.” Composition Forum, vol. 31, 2015. https://www.compositionforum.com/issue/31/individual-uptake.php. Accessed 3 Jan 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bay Jennifer. “Introduction: Disruptions of/in Professional Writing Pedagogy.” The Writing Instructor, 2010. https://parlormultimedia.com/twitest/bay-2010-05. Accessed 3 Jan 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Campbell Karolyn Kohrs. “Agency: Promiscuous and Protean.” Communication and Critical Cultural Studies, vol. 2, no. 1 2005, pp 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Carter Joyce Locke. “2016 CCCC Chair’s Address: Making, Disrupting, and Innovating.” CCC, vol. 68, no. 2 2016, pp 378–408.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cavallaro Alexandra J. “Fighting Biblical ‘Textual Harassment’: Queer Rhetorical Pedagogies in the Extracurricular.” Enculturation, 2015. https://enculturation.net/fighting-biblical-textual-harassment.html. Accessed 21 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Clary-Lemon Jennifer. “Gifts, Ancestors, and Relations: Notes Toward an Indigenous New Materialism.” Enculturation, 2019. https://www.enculturation.net/gifts_ancestors_and_relations. Accessed 17 Nov 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Comer Denise K. and White Edward M.. “Adventuring into MOOC Writing Assessment: Challenges, Results, and Possibilities.” CCC, vol. 67, no. 3 2016, pp 318–59.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Coole Diana, and Frost Samantha, “Introducing the New Materialisms,” New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics edited by Diana Coole and Frost Samantha, Duke UP 2010, pp 1–43.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cooper Marilyn. “Rhetorical Agency as Emergent and Enacted.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 62, no. 3 2011, pp 420–49.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Coskan-Johnson Gale. “Adnan Farhan Abdul Latif Did Not Go Quietly: Joint Task Force-Guantanamo and a Discourse in Motion.” Enculturation, 2015. https://enculturation.net/adnan-farhan-abdul-latif-did-not-go-quietly.html. Accessed 21 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cruz Medina. “The Writing Program Interrupted: Making Space for Critical Discourse.” Composition Studies, vol. 39, no. 2 2011, pp 167–70.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Cultural Rhetorics Theory Lab (Malea Powell, et al.). “Our Story Begins Here: Constellating Cultural Rhetorics.” Enculturation, October 2014 https://enculturation.net/our-story-begins-here. Accessed 14 August 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
23. De Line Sebastian. “All My/Our Relations: Can Posthumanism Be Decolonized? ” Open! Platform for Art, Culture & the Public Domain, 7 July 2016 https://onlineopen.org/all-my-our-relations. Accessed 30 July 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Dobrin Sidney I., and Dyson Michael E. “Race and the Public Intellectual: A Conversation with Michael Eric Dyson.” JAC, vol. 17, no. 2 1997, pp 143–81.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Faulkner Julie. “Preface.” Disrupting Pedagogies in the Knowledge Society: Countering Conservative Norms with Creative Assignments edited by Faulkner Julie, Information Science Reference 2012, pp xviii–xxiii.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Foster Helen. “Kairos and Stasis Revisited: Heuristics for the Critically Informed Composition Classroom.” Composition Forum, vol. 14, no. 2, 2005. https://compositionforum.com/issue/14.2/foster-kairos-stasis.php. Accessed 21 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Garret Bre. “Hacking the Curriculum, Disabling Composition Pedagogy: The Affordances of Writing Studio Design.” Composition Forum, vol. 39, 2018. https://compositionforum.com/issue/39/hacking.php. Accessed 21 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Geisler Cheryl. “Teaching the PostModern Rhetor: Continuing the Conversation on Rhetorical Agency.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4 2005, pp 107–13.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gries Laurie E. Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics. UP of Colorado 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gries Laurie, et al. “Rhetorical New Materialisms (RNM).” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 2 2022, pp 137–202.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Haas Angela. “Wampum as Hypertext: An American Indian Intellectual Tradition of Multimedia Theory and Practice.” Studies in American Indian Literatures, series 2, vol. 19, no. 4 2007, pp 77–100.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Haraway Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, vol. 14, no. 3 1988, pp 575–99.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Harding Sandra. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What Is ‘Strong Objectivity’?” Feminist Perspectives on Social Research edited by Hesse-Biber Sharlene Nagy and Yaiser Michelle L., Oxford UP 2004, pp 39–64.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hemmings Clare. Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory. Duke UP 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hesse Douglass. “Journals in Composition Studies, Thirty-Five Years After.” College English, vol. 81, no. 4 2019, pp 367–96.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Huckin Thomas. “Content Analysis: What Texts Talk About.” What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices edited by Bazerman Charles, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2004, pp 13–32.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Jacobs Debra. “Disrupting Understanding: The Critique of Writing as Process.” JAC, vol. 21, no. 3 2001, pp 662–74.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Jones Natasha N., et al. “Disrupting the Past to Disrupt the Future: An Antenarrative of Technical Communication.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 4 2016, pp 211–29.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Jung Julie. Revisionary Rhetoric, Feminist Pedagogy, and Multigenre Texts. Southern Illinois UP 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Jung Julie. “Systems Rhetoric: A Dynamic Coupling of Explanation and Description.” Enculturation, vol. 17 2014 https://enculturation.net/systems-rhetoric. Accessed 28 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kimmerer Robin Wall. Braiding Sweetgrass. Milkweed Editions 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Kirsch Gesa. “Methodological Pluralism: Epistemological Issues.” Methods and Methodology in Composition Research edited by Kirsch Gesa and Sullivan Patricia A. Southern Illinois UP 1992, pp 247–69.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Knoblauch Abby A. “Bodies of Knowledge: Definitions, Delineations, and Implications of Embodied Writing in the Academy.” Composition Studies, vol. 40, no. 2 2012, pp 50–65.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Koerber Amy. “Rhetorical Agency, Resistance, and the Disciplinary Rhetorics of Breastfeeding.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 1 2006, pp 87–101.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Legg Emily, and Sullivan Patricia. “Storytelling as a Balancing Practice in the Study of Posthuman Praxis.” Posthuman Praxis in Technical Communication edited by Moore Kristen R. and Richards Daniel P. Routledge 2018, pp 23–45.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Lepore Jill. “The Disruption Machine.” New Yorker, 23 June 2014 www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/06/23/the-disruption-machine. Accessed 6 June 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Martin Brian. “Methodology Is Content: Indigenous Approaches to Research and Knowledge.” Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 49, no. 14 2017, pp 1392–1400.
    [Google Scholar]
48. McIntyre Megan. “Agency Matters.” Peitho Journal, vol. 18, no. 1 2015, pp 25–28.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Micciche Laura. “Writing Material.” College English, vol. 76, no. 6 2014, pp 488–505.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Milbourne Chelsea Redeker. “Disruption, Spectacle, and Gender in Eighteenth-Century Technical Communication.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2 2016, pp 121–36.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Miller Carolyn R. “What Can Automation Tell Us about Agency? ” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 2 2007, pp 137–57.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Palmeri Jason. “Review: Disruptive Queer Narratives in Composition and Literacy Studies.” College English, vol. 80, no. 5 2018, pp 471–86.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Pauliny Tara. “Queering the Institution: Politics and Power in the Assistant Professor Administration Position.” Enculturation 2011 https://enculturation.net/queering-the-institution.html. Accessed 21 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Pough Gwendolyn. “Empowering Rhetoric: Black Students Writing Black Panthers.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 53, no. 3 2002, pp 466–86.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Prasad Pritha. “‘Coalition of Not a Home’: From Idealized Coalitions to Livable Lives.” Spark: A 4C4Equality Journal, vol. 3 2021 https://sparkactivism.com/volume-3-call/from-idealized-coalitions-to-livable-lives/. Accessed 16 Nov. 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Rafoth Ben. “Faces, Factories, and Warhols: A r(Evolutionary) Future for Writing Centers.” The Writing Center Journal, vol. 35, no. 2 2016, pp 17–30.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Randazzo Chalice. “Hearing Silence: Toward a Mixed-Method Approach for Studying Genres’ Exclusionary Potential.” Composition Forum, vol. 31 2015 https://compositionforum.com/issue/31/hearing-silence.php. Accessed 28 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Reeves Joshua. “Suspended Identification: Atopos and the Work of Public Memory.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 46, no. 3 2013, pp 306–27.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Restaino Jessica. “Writing Together: An Arendtian Framework for Collaboration.” Composition Forum, vol. 30 2014 https://compositionforum.com/issue/30/writing-together.php. Accessed 28 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Reynolds Nedra. “Interrupting Our Way to Agency: Feminist Cultural Studies and Composition.” The Norton Book of Composition Studies, Norton 2009, pp 897–910.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Riley-Mukavetz Andrea. “Developing a Relational Scholarly Practice: Snakes, Dreams, and Grandmothers.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 71, no. 4 2020, pp 545–65.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Ritchie Joy, and Boardman Kathleen. “Feminism in Composition: Inclusion, Metonymy, and Disruption.” CCC, vol. 50, no. 4 1999, pp 585–606.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Rosiek Jerry Lee, et al. “The New Materialisms and Indigenous Theories of Non-Human Agency: Making the Case for Respectful Anti-Colonial Engagement.” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 26, no. 3–4 2019, pp 331–46.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Ryan Kathleen J. “Making Pathways: Inventing Textual Research Methods in Feminist Rhetorical Studies.” Rhetorica in Motion: Feminist Rhetorical Methods and Methodologies edited by Schell Eileen E. and Rawson K. J., University of Pittsburgh Press 2010, pp 89–103.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Ryerson Rachael A. “An Overview of (a Few) Queer CCCC Sessions.” Reviews of the 2015 Conference on College Composition and Communication. https://kairos.technorhetoric.net/20.2/reviews/cccc2015/CCCC2015-reviews.pdf#page=37. Accessed 28 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Seigel Marika A. “Instructions for Systemic Change.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 61, no. 2 2009, pp W76–99.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Sohan Vanessa Kraemer. “Working English(es) as Rhetoric(s) of Disruption.” JAC, vol. 29, no. 1/2 2009, pp 270–76.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Sprague Joey, and Kobrynowicz Diane. “A Feminist Epistemology.” Feminist Perspectives on Social Research edited by Hesse-Biber Sharlene Nagy and Yaiser Michelle L., Oxford UP 2004, pp 78–98.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Stewart Kathleen. Ordinary Affects. Duke UP 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Todd Zoe. “An Indigenous Feminist’s Take on the Ontological Turn: ‘Ontology’ Is Just Another Word for Colonialism.” Journal of Historical Sociology, vol. 29, no. 1 2016, pp 4–22.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Vaid-Menon Alok. “About.” Alok. https://www.alokvmenon.com/about. Accessed July 8 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Vie Stephanie, and deWinter Jennifer. “Disrupting Intellectual Property: Collaboration and Resistance in Wikis.” Wiki Writing: Collaborative Learning in the College Classroom edited by Cummings Robert E. and Barton Matt, U of Michigan P 2008, pp 109–22.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Walters Shannon. “Graphic Disruptions: Comics, Disability, and De-Canonizing Composition.” Composition Studies, vol. 43, no. 1 2015, pp 174–77.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Warzecka Zach. “Lost in Translation: Emplacement, Disruption, and Digital Videography.” Computers and Composition Online, Fall 2013 https://www.cconlinejournal.org/Lit-Edv/Part_I.html. Accessed 21 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Watts Vanessa. “Indigenous PlaceThought and Agency Amongst Humans and Non-Humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European World Tour!)” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, and Society, vol. 2, no. 1m 2013, pp 20–34.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Weaver Courtney L. “How Rhetoric and Composition Described and Defined New Media at the Start of the Twenty-First Century.” CCC, vol. 68, no. 4 2017, pp 713–41.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Wood Tara. “Crip Disruptions: Agency, Anti-Compliance, and Autistext.” CCC, vol. 70, no. 4 2019, pp 664–80.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Zdenek Sean. “Designing Captions: Disruptive Experiments with Typography, Color, Icons, and Effects.” Kairos, vol. 23, no. 1 2018 https://kairos.techno rhetoric.net/23.1/topoi/zdenek/index.html. Accessed 21 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]