Thinking about Feeling: The Roles of Emotion in Reflective Writing

References

1. Adler-KassnerLinda, and ElizabethA. Wardle. Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies. Utah State UP, 2015.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AhmedSara. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Routledge, 2004.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alexander, Jonathan, et al. “Toward Wayfinding: A Metaphor for Understanding Writing Experiences.” Written Communication, 37no. 1, 2020, pp. 104-31.
   [Google Scholar]
4. AlexanderKara Poe. “From Story to Analysis: Reflection and Uptake in the Literacy Narrative Assignment.” Composition Studies, 43no. 2, 2015, pp. 43-71.
   [Google Scholar]
5. AllanElizabeth G., and DanaDriscoll. “The Three-Fold Benefit of Reflective Writing: Improving Program Assessment, Student Learning, and Faculty Professional Development.” Assessing Writing, 21, 2014, pp. 37-55.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BallengerBruce, and KellyMyers. “The Emotional Work of Revision” College Composition and Communication, 70no. 4, 2019, pp. 590-614.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BarrettLisa Feldman. How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BarrettLisa Feldman. “Feeling Is Perceiving: Core Affect and Conceptualization in the Experience of Emotion” Emotion and Consciousness, edited byLisa FeldmanBarrettet al.Guildford Press, 2005, pp. 255-84.
   [Google Scholar]
9. BastainHeather. “Student Affective Responses to ‘Bringing the Funk’ in the Writing Classroom.” College Composition and Communication, 69no. 1, 2017, pp. 6-34.
   [Google Scholar]
10. BelliJill. “Why Well-Being, Why Now?: Tracing an Alternate Genealogy of Emotion in Composition.” Composition Forum, 34, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
11. BerkenkotterCarol. “The Power and the Perils of Peer Review.” Rhetoric Review, 13no. 2, 1995, pp. 245-48.
    [Google Scholar]
12. BerlantLauren. “The Subject of True Feeling: Pain, Privacy, and Politics.” Transformations: Thinking through Feminism, edited bySarahAhmedet al.Routledge, 2000, pp. 33-47.
    [Google Scholar]
13. BlankenshipLisa. Changing the Subject: A Theory of Rhetorical Empathy. UP of Colorado, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
14. BowerLaurel L. “Student Reflection and Critical Thinking: A Rhetorical Analysis of 88 Portfolio Cover Letters.” Journal of Basic Writing, 22no. 2, 2003, pp. 47-66.
    [Google Scholar]
15. BrammerCharlotte, and MaryRees. “Peer Review from the Students’ Perspective: Invaluable or Invalid?” Composition Studies, 35no. 2, 2007, pp. 71-85.
    [Google Scholar]
16. BrownPenelope, and StephenLevinson. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
17. CaffiClaudia. Mitigation. Elsevier, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
18. CarloRosanne. “Countering Institutional Success Stories: Outlaw Emotions in the Literacy Narrative.” Composition Forum, 34, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
19. DryerDylan B., and David R.Russell. “Attending to Phenomenology: Rethinking Cognition and Reflection in North American Writing Studies” Contemporary Perspectives on Cognition & Writing, edited byPatriciaPortanovaet al.WAC Clearinghouse, pp. 57-76.
    [Google Scholar]
20. FraserBruce. “Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging.” New Approaches to Hedging, edited byGuntherKaltenbocket al.Brill, 2010, pp. 15-34.
    [Google Scholar]
21. HeardMatthew. “The Cost of Sharing: Attending to Contact in Composition Practices.” Composition Forum, 29, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
22. HsuV.Jo. “Reflection as Relationality: Rhetorical Alliances and Teaching Alternative Rhetorics.” College Composition and Communication, 70no. 2, pp. 142-68.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Inoue, Asao, and TylerRichmond, “Theorizing the Reflection Practices of Female Hmong College Students: Is Reflection a Racialized Discourse?” A Rhetoric of Reflection, edited byKathleenYancey, UP of Colorado, 2016, pp. 125-45.
    [Google Scholar]
24. JacobsDale, and LauraMicciche. A Way to Move: Rhetorics of Emotion and Composition Studies. Boynton/Cook Heinemann, 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
25. KeatingBenjamin. “A Good Development Thing’: A Longitudinal Analysis of Peer Review and Authority in Undergraduate Writing.” Developing Writers in Higher Education: A Longitudinal Study, edited byRuggles AnneGere. U of Michigan P, 2019, pp. 56-80.
    [Google Scholar]
26. KhostPeter H. “Researching Habits-of-Mind Self-Efficacy in First-Year College Writers.” Contemporary Perspectives on Cognition & Writing, edited byPatriciaPortanovaet al.WAC Clearinghouse, pp. 271-89.
    [Google Scholar]
27. KnoblauchA.Abby. “Bodies of Knowledge: Definitions, Delineations, and Implications of Embodied Writing in the Academy.” Composition Studies, 40no. 2, 2012, pp. 50-65.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Langdon, Lance, editor. “Emotion in Composition.” Special issue of Composition Forum, 34, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lindenman, Heatheret al. “Revision and Reflection: A Study of (Dis)Connections between Writing Knowledge and Writing Practice.” College Composition and Communication, 69no. 4, pp. 581-611.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lindquist, Kristaet al. “The Brain Basis of Emotion: A Meta-analytic Review.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35no. 3, 2012, pp. 121-43.
    [Google Scholar]
31. MackiewiczJo. The Aboutness of Writing Center Talk: A Corpus-Driven and Discourse Analysis. Routledge, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
32. MartinJames R., and Peter R.White. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
33. McLeodSusan. “Some Thoughts about Feelings: The Affective Domain and the Writing Process.” College Composition and Communication, 38no. 4, 1987, pp. 426-35.
    [Google Scholar]
34. MeyerJan HF.. , and RayLand. “Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (2): Epistemological Considerations and a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning.” Higher Education, 2005, 49, pp. 373-88.
    [Google Scholar]
35. MiccicheLaura R. Doing Emotion: Rhetoric, Writing, Teaching. Boynton/Cook, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
36. OmizoRyan, and BillHart-Davidson. “Hedge-O-Matic.” Enculturation. 12May 2016. http://hedgeomatic.cal.msu.edu/hedgeomatic.
    [Google Scholar]
37. ReidE. Shelley. “Defining Dispositions: Mapping Student Attitudes and Strategies in College Composition.” Contemporary Perspectives on Cognition & Writing, edited byPatriciaPortanovaet al.WAC Clearinghouse, 2017, pp. 292-312.
    [Google Scholar]
38. ReynoldsNedra, and RichRice. Portfolio Teaching: A Guide for Instructors. 2nd ed.Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
39. RossShawna, and DouglasDowland. “Guest Editors’ Introduction: Anxious Pedagogies.” Pedagogy, 19no. 3, 2019, pp. 509-12.
    [Google Scholar]
40. ScottMike. “Comparing Corpora and Identifying Key Words, Collocations, and Frequency Distributions Through the WordSmith Tools Suite of Computer Programs.” Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice, edited byMohsenGhadessyet al., John Benjamins, 2001, pp. 47-67.
    [Google Scholar]
41. SladekAmanda. “The New Literacies Narrative,” Writing on the Edge, 26no. 1, 2015, pp. 63-72.
    [Google Scholar]
42. SommersJeff. “Problematizing Reflection: Conflicted Motives in the Writer’s Memo.” A Rhetoric of Reflection, edited byKathleenYancey, UP of Colorado, 2016, pp 271-87.
    [Google Scholar]
43. SommersJeff. “Reflection Revisited: The Class Col-lage” Journal of Basic Writing, 30no. 1, 2011, pp. 99-129.
    [Google Scholar]
44. SommersNancy. “Across the Drafts.” College Composition and Communication, 58no. 2, 2006, pp. 248-57.
    [Google Scholar]
45. StenbergShari. “Teaching and (Re)learning the Rhetoric of Emotion.” Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature Language Composition and Culture, 11no. 2, 2011, pp. 349-69.
    [Google Scholar]
46. TaczakKara. “Reflection Is Critical for Writers’ Development.” Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies, edited byLindaAdler-Kassner and Elizabeth A. Wardle. Utah State UP, 2015, pp. 78-79.
    [Google Scholar]
47. TrimbleThomas, and AdrienneJenkins. “Using Taxonomies of Metacognitive Behaviors to Analyze Student Reflection and Improve Teaching Practice.” Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature Language Composition and Culture, 19no. 3, pp. 433-54.
    [Google Scholar]
48. ValentineKathryn. “Plagiarism as Literacy Practice: Recognizing and Rethinking Ethical Binaries.” College Composition and Communication, 58no. 1, 2006, pp. 89-109.
    [Google Scholar]
49. VytalKatherine, and StephenHamann. “Neuroimaging Support for Discrete Neural Correlates of Basic Emotions: A Voxel-based Meta-analysis.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22no. 12, 2010, pp. 2864-85.
    [Google Scholar]
50. WinansAmy E. “Cultivating Critical Emotional Literacy: Cognitive and Contemplative Approaches to Engaging Difference.” College English, 75no. 2, 2012, pp. 150-70.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Winslow, Dianna and PhilShaw. “Teaching Metacognition to Reinforce Agency in Course-Linked First-Year Courses.” Contemporary Perspectives on Cognition & Writing, edited byPatriciaPortanovaet al.WAC Clearinghouse, 2017, pp. 191-209.
    [Google Scholar]
52. WorshamLynn. “Going Postal: Pedagogic Violence and the Schooling of Emotion.” JAC, 18no. 2, 1998, pp. 213-45.
    [Google Scholar]
53. YanceyKathleen. “Contextualizing Reflection.” A Rhetoric of Reflection, edited byKathleenYancey, UP of Colorado, 2016, 3-22.
    [Google Scholar]
54. YanceyKathleen. “Dialogue, Interplay, and Discovery: Mapping the Role and the Rhetoric of Reflection in Portfolio Assessment.” Writing Portfolios in the Classroom: Policy and Practice, Promise and Peril, edited byRobert C. Calfee and PamelaPerfumo, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996, pp. 83-102.
    [Google Scholar]
55. ZakiJamil. The War for Kindness: Building Empathy in a Fractured World. Crown, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]