Skip to content
2018
Volume 74, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0010-096X
  • E-ISSN: 1939-9006

Abstract

Currently, creative writing and writing studies occupy different disciplinary positions, but this relationship doesn’t need to be adversarial. This study illustrates “line-crossing” pedagogies of two creative writers who teach FYW to further the discussion of creative writing’s place in FYW and to help bridge disciplinary gaps.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202232275
2022-12-01
2025-02-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Association of Writers & Writing Programs. “Annual Report on the Academic Job Market,”AWP Official Guide to Writing Programs, 2012. https://www.awpwriter.org/magazine_media/writers_notebook_view/158/annual_report_on_the_academic_job_market.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey, Christine, and BizzaroPatrick. “Research in Creative Writing: Theory into Practice.” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 52, no. 1, 2017, pp. 77–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartholomae, David. “Inventing the University.”Writing on the Margins. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 60–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bishop, Wendy. “Crossing the Lines: On Creative Composition and Composing Creative Writing.” Writing on the Edge, vol. 4, no. 2, 1993, pp. 117–33
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bishop, Wendy. “My Moon.” The Iowa Review, vol. 32, no. 2, 2002, p. 104.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bishop, Wendy. “Writing from the Tips of Our Tongues: Writers, Tutors, and Talk.” The Writing Center Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, 1993, pp. 30–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bizzaro, Patrick. “Research and Reflection in English Studies: The Special Case of Creative Writing.” College English, vol. 66, no. 3, 2004, pp. 294–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bizzell, Patricia. “What Happens When Basic Writers Come to College?”College Composition and Communication, vol. 37, no. 3, 1986, pp. 294–301.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brandt, Deborah. “Sponsors of Literacy.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 49, no. 2, 1998, pp. 165–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Clance, Pauline R., and ImesSuzanne A.. “The Imposter Phenomenon in High Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Intervention.” Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, vol. 15, no. 3, 1978, pp. 241–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Connors, Robert. “Historical Inquiry in Composition Studies.” The Writing Instructor, vol. 3, no. 4, 1984, pp. 157–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cutri, Jennifer et al. “Academic Integrity at Doctoral Level: The Influence of the Imposter Phenomenon and Cultural Differences on Academic Writing.” International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 17, no. 1, 2021, pp. 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Day-Calder, Mandy. “Student Life—Imposter Syndrome: Feeling Like a Fake Inside Despite Outward Success Is Not Unusual for Nursing Students, But There Are Ways to Overcome These Emotions.” Nursing Standard, vol. 31, no. 43, 2017, p. 35.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dias, Patrick, and ParéAnthony. Transitions: Writing in Academic and Workplace Settings. Hampton Press, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Donnelly, Dianne J.Establishing Creative Writing Studies as an Academic Discipline. 2009. U of South Florida, PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Downs, Douglas, and WardleElizabeth. “Teaching about Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning ‘First-Year Composition’ as ‘Introduction to Writing Studies.’”College Composition and Communication, vol. 58, no. 4, 2007, pp. 552–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Driscoll, Dana L., LeighS.R., and ZaminNadia F.. “Self-Care as Professionalization: A Case for Ethical Doctoral Education in Composition Studies.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 71, no. 3, 2020, pp. 453–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dueñas, Mary. You’re Not Really Here Because You Deserve to Be Here: How Latinx College Students Experience Imposter Syndrome. 2021. U of Wisconsin-Madison, PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fenza, David. “The Centre Has Not Held: Creative Writing & Pluralism.” New Writing (Clevedon, England), vol. 8, no. 3, 2011, pp. 206–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gallagher, John R. “A Framework for Internet Case Study Methodology in Writing Studies.” Computers and Composition, vol. 54, 2019, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldblatt, Eli. “Don’t Call It Expressivism: Legacies of a ‘Tacit Tradition.’”College Composition and Communication68(3), 2017, pp. 438–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Graff, Gerald. “What We Say When We Don’t Talk about Creative Writing.” College English, vol. 71, no. 3, 2009, pp. 271–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Haake, Katherine. What My Speech Disrupts: Feminism and Creative Writing Studies. National Council of Teachers of English, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hesse, Douglas. “EJ in focus: Imagining a place for creative nonfiction.” English Journal, vol. 99, no.2, 2009, pp. 18–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hesse, Douglas. “The Place of Creative Nonfiction.” College English, vol. 65, no. 3, Jan. 2003, pp. 237–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hesse, Douglas. “The Place of Creative Writing in Composition Studies.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 62, no. 1, 2010, pp. 31–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hesse, Douglas, and O’NeillPeggy. “Writing as Practiced and Studied Beyond ‘Writing Studies.’(Re)Considering What we Know: Learning Thresholds in Writing, Composition, Rhetoric, and Literacy, edited byAdler-KassnerLinda and WardleElizabeth. Utah State UP, 2019, pp. 76–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Irmscher, William F. “Finding a Comfortable Identity.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 38, no. 1, 1987, pp. 81–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kahn, Seth. “Putting Ethnographic Writing in Context.” Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing2, edited byLoweCharles and ZemlianskyPavel. Parlor Press, 2011, pp. 175–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kress, Gunther. Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy. Routledge, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Leander, Kevin, and BoldtGail. “Rereading ‘A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies’: Bodies, Texts, and Emergence.” Journal of Literacy Research, vol. 45, no. 1, 2013, pp. 22–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mahiri, Jabari, and SabloSoraya. “Writing for Their Lives: The Non-School Literacy of California’s Urban African American Youth.” The Journal of Negro Education, vol. 65, no. 2, 1996, pp. 164–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mayers, Tim. (Re)Writing Craft: Composition, Creative Writing, and the Future of English Studies. U of Pittsburgh P, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Moxley, Joseph. “Creative Writing and Composition: Bridging the Gap.” AWP Chronicle, vol. 23, no. 1, 1990, pp. 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ng, Isaac K. S., and TayDesiree S. H.. “Imposter Syndrome—Perspectives of Final Year Medical Students.” Medical Education, vol. 55, no. 9, 2021, p. 1110.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. North, Stephen. The Making of Knowledge in Composition: Portrait of an Emerging Field. Boynton/Cook Publishers, 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Papen, Uta, and TustingKarin. “Creativity in Everyday Literacy Practices: The Contribution of an Ethnographic Approach.” Literacy and Numeracy Studies16(1), 2008, pp. 5–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pigg, Stacey. “Emplacing Mobile Composing Habits: A Study of Academic Writing in Networked Social Spaces.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 66, no. 2, 2014, pp. 250–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Schwartz, Melanie. “Retaining Our Best: Imposter Syndrome, Cultural Safety, Complex Lives and Indigenous Student Experiences of Law School.” Legal Education Review, vol. 28, no. 2, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Selfe, Cynthia L., and HawisherGail E.. “Exceeding the Bounds of the Interview: Feminism, Mediation, Narrative, and Conversations about Digital Literacy.” Writing Studies Research in Practice: Methods and Methodologies, edited byNickosonLee, SheridanMary P. Southern Illinois UP, 2012, pp. 36–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Shipka, Jody. Toward a Composition Made Whole, U of Pittsburgh P, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Stegner, Wallace, and ScowcroftRichard. Twenty Years of Stanford Short Stories. Stanford UP, 1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Stotsky, Sandra. “Research, Teaching, and Public Policy.”Composition in the Twenty-First Century: Crisis and Change, edited byBloomLynn, DaikerDonald A., and WhiteEdward M.. Southern Illinois UP, 1997, pp. 208–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sumpter, Matthew. “Shared Frequency: Expressivism, Social Constructionism, and the Linked Creative Writing-Composition Class.” College English, vol. 78, no. 4, 2016, pp. 340–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Yancey, Kathleen B. “Made Not Only in Words: Composition in a New Key.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 56, no. 2, 2004, pp. 297–328.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Yim, Maria. “‘Where Are the Female Athletes?’: An Investigation of College Student Perceptions of Gender Representation in the Media,”Stylus: A Journal of First-Year Writing, vol. 10, no. 1, 2019, https://cah.ucf.edu/writingrhetoric/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2019/10/Stylus_10_1_Yim.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202232275
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202232275
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error