Relationality in the Transfer of Writing Knowledge

References

1. Adler-KassnerLinda, WardleElizabethNaming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing StudiesUtah State UP2015
   [Google Scholar]
2. AlexanderAmy L. et al. “From Gaming to Training: A Review of Studies on Fidelity, Immersion, Presence, and Buy-in and Their Effects on Transfer in PC-based Simulations and Games.” DARWARS Training Impact Group2005114
   [Google Scholar]
3. AlexanderKara Poe et al. “Adaptive Remediation and the Facilitation of Transfer in Multiliteracy Center Contexts.” Computers and Composition, vol. 4120163245
   [Google Scholar]
4. BeachKing“Consequential Transitions: A Sociocultural Expedition Beyond Transfer in Education.” Review of Research in Education, vol. 24no. 1199910139
   [Google Scholar]
5. BeaufortAnneCollege Writing and Beyond: A New Framework for University Writing InstructionUtah State UP2007
   [Google Scholar]
6. BergmannLinda S., ZepernickJanet“Disciplinarity and Transfer: Students’ Perceptions of Learning to Write.” WPA, vol. 31no. 1-2200612449
   [Google Scholar]
7. BlommaertJan, HornerBruce“Mobility and Academic Literacies: An Epistolary Conversation.” London Review of Education, vol. 15no. 12017220
   [Google Scholar]
8. BrandtDeborah“Writing Development and Life-Course Development: The Case of Working Adults.”The Life-span Development of WritingNational Council of Teachers of English201824471
   [Google Scholar]
9. BransfordJohn D., SchwartzDaniel L.“Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal with Multiple Implications.” Review of Research in Education, vol. 24no. 1199961100
   [Google Scholar]
10. BransfordJohn D. et al. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Expanded Edition)National Academy Press2000
    [Google Scholar]
11. CampbellLily“Simulation Genres and Student Uptake: The Patient Health Record in Clinical Nursing Simulations.” Written Communication, vol. 34no. 3201725579
    [Google Scholar]
12. CarrollLee AnnRehearsing New Roles: How College Students Develop as WritersSouthern Illinois UP2002
    [Google Scholar]
13. CarterMichael“The Idea of Expertise: An Exploration of Cognitive and Social Dimensions of Writing.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 41no. 3199026586
    [Google Scholar]
14. ChaseWilliam G., SimonHerbert A.“Perception in Chess.” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 4no. 119735581
    [Google Scholar]
15. CookVivian“Transfer and the Relationships Between the Languages of MultiCompetence.”Crosslinguistic Influence in Second Language Acquisitionedited byAlonsoR.A. (20162437
    [Google Scholar]
16. CromwellSusan E., KolbJudith A.“An Examination of Work-Environment Support Factors Affecting Transfer of Supervisory Skills Training to the Workplace.” Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 15no. 4200444971
    [Google Scholar]
17. DannelsDeanna P.“Teaching and Learning Design Presentations in Engineering: Contradictions Between Academic and Workplace Activity Systems.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 17no. 2200313969
    [Google Scholar]
18. DaySamuel B., GoldstoneRobert L.“Analogical Transfer from a Simulated Physical System.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 37no. 3201155167
    [Google Scholar]
19. DePalmaMichael-John“Tracing Transfer Across Media: Investigating Writers’ Perceptions of Cross-Contextual and Rhetorical Reshaping in Processes of Remediation.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 66no. 4201561542
    [Google Scholar]
20. DePalmaMichael-John, AlexanderKara Poe“A Bag Full of Snakes: Negotiating the Challenges of Multimodal Composition.” Computers and Composition, vol. 372015182200
    [Google Scholar]
21. DePalmaMichael-John, RingerJeffrey M.“Toward a Theory of Adaptive Transfer: Expanding Disciplinary Discussions of ‘Transfer’ in Second-Language Writing and Composition Studies.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 20no. 2201113447
    [Google Scholar]
22. DonahueChristiane“Transfer, Portability, Generalization: (How) Does Composition Expertise ‘Carry’?”Exploring Composition Studies: Sites, Issues, and Perspectivesedited byRitterKelly, MatsudaPaul Kei (201214566
    [Google Scholar]
23. DonahueChristiane“Writing and Global Transfer Narratives: Situating the Knowledge Transformation Conversation.” Critical Transitions: Writing and the Question of Transfer. edited byAnsonChris M., MooreJessie L.The WAC Clearinghouse and UP of Colorado201610736
    [Google Scholar]
24. DriscollDana Lynn“Building Connections and Transferring Knowledge: The Benefits of a Peer Tutoring Course Beyond the Writing Center.” The Writing Center Journal, vol. 35no. 1201515381
    [Google Scholar]
25. DriscollDana Lynn, HarcourtSarah“Training vs. Learning: Transfer of Learning in a Peer Tutoring Course and Beyond.” Writing Lab Newsletter, vol. 36no. 7–8201216
    [Google Scholar]
26. DriscollDana Lynn, JinDaewoo“The Box Under the Bed: How Learner Epistemologies Shape Writing Transfer.” Across the Disciplines, vol. 15no. 42018121
    [Google Scholar]
27. DriscollDana Lynn, WellsJennifer“Beyond Knowledge and Skills: Writing Transfer and the Role of Student Dispositions.” Composition Forum, vol. 262012http://composition forum.com/issue/26/beyond-knowledge-skills.phpAccessed 8 April 2021
    [Google Scholar]
28. DysonAnne Haas“Transforming transfer: Unruly Children, Contrary Texts, and the Persistence of the Pedagogical Order.” Review of Research in Education, vol. 24199914171
    [Google Scholar]
29. EngleRandi A.“Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in a Community of Learners Classroom.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 15no. 4200645198
    [Google Scholar]
30. EngleRandi A. et al. “The Influence of Framing on Transfer: Initial Evidence from a Tutoring Experiment.” Instructional Science, vol. 39no. 5201160328
    [Google Scholar]
31. EvansJonathan St B.T.“Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 59200825578
    [Google Scholar]
32. FoertschJulie“Where Cognitive Psychology Applies: How Theories About Memory and Transfer Can Influence Composition Pedagogy.” Written Communication, vol. 12no. 3199536083
    [Google Scholar]
33. FreedmanAviva et al. “Wearing Suits to Class: Simulating Genres and Simulations as Genre.” Written Communication, vol. 11no. 21994193226
    [Google Scholar]
34. FyfeEmily R. et al. “Concreteness Fading in Mathematics and Science Instruction: A Systematic Review.” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 26no. 12014925
    [Google Scholar]
35. GickMary L., HolyoakKeith J.“Analogical Problem Solving.” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 12no. 3198030655
    [Google Scholar]
36. GickMary L., HolyoakKeith J.“Schema Induction and Analogical Transfer.” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 15no. 11983138
    [Google Scholar]
37. GillamAlice M.“Returning Students’ Ways of Writing: Implications for First-Year College Composition.” Journal of Teaching Writing, vol. 10no. 11991120
    [Google Scholar]
38. HagemannJulie“Writing Centers as Sites for Writing Transfer Research.”Writing Center Perspectivesedited byStayByron L., MurphyChristine, HobsonEricNational Writing Center Association199512031
    [Google Scholar]
39. DavidHammer et al. “Resources, Framing, and Transfer.” Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary PerspectiveMestreJose P.Information Age Publishing2005
    [Google Scholar]
40. HelfensteinS.Transfer: Review, Reconstruction, and ResolutionUnpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Jyva ‘ skyla’2005
    [Google Scholar]
41. JarrattSusan C. et al. “Pedagogical Memory: Writing, Mapping, Translating.” WPA: Writing Program Administration-Journal of the Council of Writing Program Administrators, vol. 33no. 120094673
    [Google Scholar]
42. JuddCharles H.“The Relation of Special Training and General Intelligence.” Educational Review, vol. 3619082842
    [Google Scholar]
43. KahnemanDaniel“A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality.” American Psychologist, vol. 58no. 92003697720
    [Google Scholar]
44. KaminskiJennifer A. et al. “The Cost of Concreteness: The Effect of Nonessential Information on Analogical Transfer.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, vol. 19no. 120131429
    [Google Scholar]
45. KatonaGeorgeOrganizing and Memorizing: Studies in the Psychology of Learning and Teaching. Columbia UP1940
    [Google Scholar]
46. KnutsonAnna“It’s All Part of an Education”: Case Studies of Writing Knowledge Transfer Across Academic and Social Media Domains Among Four Feminist College Students.(Publication No. 11006938). [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan]ProQuest Dissertations Publishing2018
    [Google Scholar]
47. KubotaRyuko“An Investigation of L1–L2 Transfer in Writing Among Japanese University Students: Implications for Contrastive Rhetoric.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 7no. 1199869100
    [Google Scholar]
48. LeMesurierJennifer Lin“Mobile Bodies: Triggering Bodily Uptake Through Movement.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 68no. 22016292316
    [Google Scholar]
49. LemkeJay L.“Across the Scales of Rime: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems.” Mind, Culture, and Activity, vol. 7no. 4200027390
    [Google Scholar]
50. LightRichard“Complex Learning Theory—Its Epistemology and Its Assumptions about Learning: Implications for Physical Education.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, vol. 27no. 120082137
    [Google Scholar]
51. LightRichard, RodFawns“Knowing the Game: Integrating Speech and Action in Games Teaching Through TGfU.” Quest, vol. 55no. 2200316176
    [Google Scholar]
52. LindenmanHeather“Inventing Metagenres: How Four College Seniors Connect Writing Across Domains.”Composition Forum, vol. 31Association of Teachers of Advanced Composition2015http://compositionforum.com/issue/31/inventing-metagenres.phpAccessed 11 April 2021
    [Google Scholar]
53. LobatoJoanne“When Students Don’t Apply the Knowledge You Think They Have, Rethink Your Assumptions about Transfer.”Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate MathematicsMathematical Association of America2008289304
    [Google Scholar]
54. LobatoJoanne“The Actor-Oriented Transfer Perspective and Its Contributions to Educational Research and Practice.” Educational Psychologist, vol. 47no. 3201223247
    [Google Scholar]
55. LobatoJoanne et al. “‘Noticing’ as an Alternative Transfer of Learning Process.” Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 21no. 3201243382
    [Google Scholar]
56. MaranNicola J., GlavinRonnie J.“Low-to High-Fidelity Simulation—A Continuum of Medical Education?”Medical Education, vol. 3720032228
    [Google Scholar]
57. MatsudaPaul Kei“Contrastive Rhetoric in Context: A Dynamic Model of L2 writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 6no. 119974560
    [Google Scholar]
58. MenaryRichard“Introduction to the Special issue on 4E Cognition.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, vol. 9201045963
    [Google Scholar]
59. MeyerJan H. F. et al. Threshold Concepts and Transformation Learning Sense2010
    [Google Scholar]
60. MichaudMichael J.“The ‘Reverse Commute’: Adult Students and the Transition from Professional to Academic Literacy.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol. 38no. 3201124457
    [Google Scholar]
61. MooreJessie“Mapping the Questions: The State of Writing-Related Transfer Research.” Composition Forum, vol. 262012http://compositionforum.org/issue/26/map-questions-transfer-research.phpAccessed 8 April 2021
    [Google Scholar]
62. NavarreCleary“Flowing and Freestyling: Learning from Adult Students about Process Knowledge Transfer.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 64no. 4201366187
    [Google Scholar]
63. NemirovskyRicardo“Episodic Feelings and Transfer of Learning.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 20no. 2201130837
    [Google Scholar]
64. NonakaIkujiro“A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation.” Organization Science, vol. 5no. 119941437
    [Google Scholar]
65. NowacekRebecca S.Agents of Integration: Understanding Transfer as a Rhetorical ActSIU Press2011
    [Google Scholar]
66. NowacekRebecca S. et al. “‘Transfer Talk’ in Talk about Writing in Progress: Two Propositions about Transfer of Learning.” Composition Forum, vol. 422019http://compositionforum.com/issue/42/transfer-talk.phpAccessed 8 April 2021
    [Google Scholar]
67. PavlenkoAneta“L2 Influence on L1 in Late Bilingualism.” Issues in Applied Linguistics, vol. 11no. 22000175205
    [Google Scholar]
68. PavlenkoAneta, JarvisScott“Bidirectional Transfer.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 23no. 22002190214
    [Google Scholar]
69. PerkinsDavid N., SalomonGavriel“Are Cognitive Skills Context-Bound?”Educational Researcher, vol. 18no. 119891625
    [Google Scholar]
70. PetragliaJosephReconceiving Writing, Rethinking Writing Instruction. Routledge1995
    [Google Scholar]
71. PiggStaceyTransient Literacies in Action: Composing with the Mobile SurroundThe WAC Clearinghouse; UP of Colorado2021
    [Google Scholar]
72. PolyaGeorgeHow to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method2nd edPrinceton UP19451988
    [Google Scholar]
73. PouwWim T.J.L. et al. “An Embedded and Embodied Cognition Review of Instructional Manipulatives.” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 2620145172
    [Google Scholar]
74. PriorPaul“How Do Moments Add Up To Lives: Trajectories of Semiotic Becoming Vs. Tales of School Learning in Four Modes.”Making Future Mattersedited byWysockiRicka, SheridanMary P.Computers and Composition Digital Press2018http://ccdigitalpress.org/book/makingfuturematters/
    [Google Scholar]
75. PriorPaul, OlingerAndrea R.“Academic Literacies as Laminated Assemblage and Embodied Semiotic Becoming.”Retheorizing Literacy Practices: Complex Social and Cultural Contextsedited byBloomeDavid, CastanheiraMaria Lucia, LeungConstant, RowsellJenniferRoutledge201912639
    [Google Scholar]
76. PriorPaul, ShipkaJody“Chronotopic Lamination: Tracing the Contours of Literate Activity.”Writing Selves / Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectivesedited byBazermanCharles, RussellDavid R.WAC Clearinghouse2003180238
    [Google Scholar]
77. QualleyDonna“Building a Conceptual Topography of the Transfer Terrain.”Critical Transitions: Writing and the Question of Transferedited byAnsonChris, MooreJessieWAC Clearinghouse201669106
    [Google Scholar]
78. ReiffMary Jo, BawarshiAnis“Tracing Discursive Resources: How Students Use Prior Genre Knowledge to Negotiate New Writing Contexts in First-Year Composition.” Written Communication, vol. 28no. 3201131237
    [Google Scholar]
79. RifenburgMichael J.The Embodied Playbook: Writing Practices of Student-AthletesUtah State UP2018
    [Google Scholar]
80. RingerJeffrey, SeanMorey“Posthumanizing Writing Transfer.” College English, vol. 83no. 42021289311
    [Google Scholar]
81. RobinsonAndrew, ManiaKaterina“Technological Research Challenges of Flight Simulation and Flight Instructor Assessments of Perceived Fidelity.” Simulation & Gaming, vol. 38no. 1200711235
    [Google Scholar]
82. RoozenKevin, EricksonJoeExpanding Literate Landscapes: Persons, Practices, and Sociohistoric Perspectives of Disciplinary DevelopmentComputers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State UP2017
    [Google Scholar]
83. RosinskiPaula“Students’ Perceptions of the Transfer of Rhetorical Knowledge Between Digital Self-Sponsored Writing and Academic Writing: The Importance of Authentic Contexts and Reflection.”Critical Transitions: Writing and the Question of Transferedited byAnsonChris M., MooreJessie L.WAC Clearinghouse201625176
    [Google Scholar]
84. RounsavilleAngela, et al. “From Incomes to Outcomes: FYW Students’ Prior Genre Knowledge, Meta-Cognition, and the Question of Transfer.” WPA: Writing Program Administration, vol. 32no. 1200897112
    [Google Scholar]
85. RuleHannah J.Situating Writing ProcessesWAC Clearinghouse and UP of Colorado2019
    [Google Scholar]
86. RussellDavid“Activity Theory and Its Implications for Writing Instruction.”Reconceiving Writing, Rethinking Writing Instructionedited byPetragliaJoseph (19955178
    [Google Scholar]
87. RussellDavid, FisherDavid“Online, Multimedia Case Studies for Professional Education: Revisioning Concepts of Genre Recognition.”Genres in the Internet: Issues in the Theory of Genreedited byGiltrowJanet, SteinDieterJohn Benjamins Publishing Co.200916391
    [Google Scholar]
88. SchieberDanica L.“Invisible Transfer: An Unexpected Finding in the Pursuit of Transfer.” Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, vol. 79no. 4201646486
    [Google Scholar]
89. SchunkDale H.Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective4th edPearson2004
    [Google Scholar]
90. SharwoodSmith, KellermanEric“Crosslinguistic Influence in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction.”Crosslinguistic Influence in Second Language Acquisitionedited bySmithMichael Sharwood, KellermanEricPergamon, 198619
    [Google Scholar]
91. ShiffrinRichard M., SchneiderWalter“Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: II. Perceptual Learning, Automatic Attending, and a General Theory.” Psychological Review, vol. 84no. 2197712790
    [Google Scholar]
92. SmitDavid W.The End of Composition Studies. Southern Illinois UP2004
    [Google Scholar]
93. SpinuzziClay“Pseudotransactionality, Activity Theory, and Professional Writing Instruction.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 5no. 31996295308
    [Google Scholar]
94. TardyChristine M.“Crossing, or Creating, Divides? A Plea for Transdisciplinary Scholarship.” Crossing Divides: Exploring Translingual Writing Pedagogies and Programs, edited by Bruce Horner and Lisa Tetreault, Utah State UP201718189
    [Google Scholar]
95. TeterisElise et al. “Does Training Learners on Simulators Benefit Real Patients?”Advances in Health Sciences Education, vol. 17201213744
    [Google Scholar]
96. TerttuTuomi-Gröhn, EngeströmYrgoBetween School and Work: New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary-Crossing. Pergamon2003
    [Google Scholar]
97. VanKootenCrystalTransfer Across Media: Using Digital Video in the Teaching of WritingComputers and Composition Digital P/Utah State UP2020https://ccdigitalpress.org/book/transfer-across-media/index.html.
    [Google Scholar]
98. WalkerKristin“The Debate Over Generalist and Specialist Tutors: Genre Theory’s Contribution.” The Writing Center Journal, vol. 18no. 219982746
    [Google Scholar]
99. WalvoordBarbara E., McCarthyLucille P.Thinking and Writing in College: A Naturalistic Study of Students in Four DisciplinesThe WAC Clearinghouse and National Council of Teachers of English1990
    [Google Scholar]
100. WardleElizabeth“Researching Transfer: Addressing the Challenges of Knowing What Works.” Conference on College Composition and Communication, Kansas City2018
     [Google Scholar]
101. WardleElizabeth“Understanding ‘Transfer’ from FYC: Preliminary Results of a Longitudinal Study.” WPA: Writing Program Administration, vol. 31no. 1-220076585
     [Google Scholar]
102. WinzenriedMisty Anne, et al. “Co-Constructing Writing Knowledge: Students’ Collaborative Talk across Contexts.” Composition Forum, vol. 372017https://compositionforum.com/issue/37/co-constructing.php., Accessed 11 April 2021
     [Google Scholar]
103. YanceyKathleen Blake et al. Writing Across Contexts: Transfer, Composition, and Sites of WritingUtah State UP2014
     [Google Scholar]
104. YanceyKathleen Blake et al. “The Teaching for Transfer Curriculum: The Role of Concurrent Transfer and Inside-and Outside-School Contexts in Supporting Students’ Writing Development.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 71no. 2201926895
     [Google Scholar]