Theorizing Writing Differently: How Community-Engaged Projects in First-Year Composition Shape Students’ Writing Theories and Strategies

References

1. BaconNora “Setting the Course for Service-Learning Research.” Reflections vol. 2, no. 120011–7
   [Google Scholar]
2. BallKevin, GoodburnAmy M. “Composition Studies and Service Learning: Appealing to Communities?” Composition Studies vol. 28, no. 1200079–94
   [Google Scholar]
3. BazermanCharles, TinbergHoward “Text Is an Object Outside of Oneself That Can Be Improved and Developed.” Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studiesedited byAdler-KassnerLinda, WardleElizabethUtah State University Press, 201561–62
   [Google Scholar]
4. BermanMarisa, et al. “From Obscurity to Valuable Contributor: A Case for Critical Service-Learning.” Basic Writing e-Journal vol. 13, no. 120141–25
   [Google Scholar]
5. BranstadJeremy “A Service-Learning and Transfer-Oriented Approach to Teaching Developmental Reading and Writing Students.” Basic Writing e-Journal vol. 13, no. 120141–15
   [Google Scholar]
6. “CCCC Statement on Community-Engaged Projects in Rhetoric and Composition.”Conference on College Composition and Communication2016href="http://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/community-engaged
   [Google Scholar]
7. ChaoRogerNavigation and Negotiation: Examining the Ecology of Service-Learning Composition Courses, 2017University of Washington, PhD Dissertation
   [Google Scholar]
8. DeansThomasWriting Partnerships: Service-Learning in Composition. National Council of Teachers of English, 2000
   [Google Scholar]
9. DeansThomas “Genre Analysis and the Community Writing Course.” Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric vol. 5, no. 120067–25
   [Google Scholar]
10. DownsDoug “Revision is Central to Developing Writing.” Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studiesedited byAdler-KassnerLinda, WardleElizabethUtah State University Press, 201566–67
    [Google Scholar]
11. DownsDoug, RoberstonLiane “Threshold Concepts in First-Year Composition.” Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studiesedited byAdler-KassnerLinda, WardleElizabethUtah State University Press, 2015105–21
    [Google Scholar]
12. DriscollDana Lynn, CuiWenqi “Visible and Invisible Transfer: A Longitudinal Investigation of Learning to Write and Transfer Across Five Years.” College Composition and Communication vol. 73, no. 22022229–60
    [Google Scholar]
13. DriscollDana Lynn, et al. “Genre Knowledge and Writing Development: Results from the Writing Transfer Project.” Written Communication vol. 37, no. 1202069–103
    [Google Scholar]
14. DryerDylan B. “Divided by Primes: Competing Meanings Among Writing Studies’ Keywords.” College English vol. 81, no. 32019214–55
    [Google Scholar]
15. DubinskyJames M. “Service-Learning as a Path to Virtue: The Ideal Orator in Professional Communication.” Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning vol. 8, no. 220026174
    [Google Scholar]
16. EmersonRobert M., et al. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes2nd edUniversity of Chicago Press, 2011
    [Google Scholar]
17. FeldmanAnn M., et al. “The Impact of Partnership-Centered, Community-Based Learning on First-Year Students’ Academic Research Papers.” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning vol. 13, no. 1200616–29
    [Google Scholar]
18. FlowerLindaCommunity Literacy and the Rhetoric of Public Engagement. Southern Illinois UP, 2008
    [Google Scholar]
19. GeislerCheryl, SwartsJasonCoding Streams of Language: Techniques for the Systematic Coding of Text, Talk, and Other Verbal Data. The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado, 2019. http://wac.colostate.edu/books/practice/codingstreams/
    [Google Scholar]
20. GoldblattEli “Alinsky’s Reveille: A Community-Organizing Model for Neighborhood-Based Literacy Projects.” College English vol. 67, no. 32005274–95
    [Google Scholar]
21. GoldblattEli “What is Community Literacy?”. A Rhetoric for Writing Program Administratorsedited byMalenczykRitaParlor Press, 2013289–301
    [Google Scholar]
22. GoodwinPhillip “Embodied Subjectivities and the City: Intervening in Local Public Debates through Multimodality.” College Composition and Communication vol. 72, no. 22020224–50
    [Google Scholar]
23. GrobmanLaurie “(Re)Writing Local Racial, Ethnic, and Cultural Histories: Negotiating Shared Meaning in Public Rhetoric Partnerships.” College English vol. 77, no. 32015236–58
    [Google Scholar]
24. HolmesAshley J.Public Pedagogy in Composition StudiesCCCC/NCTE, 2016
    [Google Scholar]
25. InoueAsao B. “How Do We Language So People Stop Killing Each Other, Or What Do We Do about White Language Supremacy?” College Composition and Communication vol. 71, no. 22019352–69
    [Google Scholar]
26. IversonChris “The Long-Term Effects of Service-Learning on Composition Students.” Reflections vol. 19, no. 2Fall/Winter2019202011–37
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kimme HeaAmy C., ShahRachael Wendler “Silent Partners: Developing a Critical Understanding of Community Partners in Technical Communication Service-Learning Pedagogies.” Technical Communication Quarterly vol. 25, no. 1201648–66
    [Google Scholar]
28. LeonKendall, SuraThomas “We Don’t Need Any More Brochures”: Rethinking Deliverables in Service-Learning Curricula.” Writing Program Administration vol. 36, no. 2201359–74
    [Google Scholar]
29. LindenmanHeather “From the Center to the Sidelines: Responsive Leadership in a High School-College Writing Partnership.” Writing for Engagement: Responsive Practice for Social Actionedited bySheridanMary P., BardolphMegan J., HolladayDrewLexington Press, 2018153–66
    [Google Scholar]
30. LindenmanHeather, LohrJustin “What Changes When We ‘Write for Change’?: Considering the Consequences of a High School-University Writing Partnership.” Reflections vol. 18, no. 120188–38
    [Google Scholar]
31. LindenmanHeather, et al. “Revision and Reflection: A Study of (Dis)connections between Writing Knowledge and Writing Practice.” College Composition and Communication vol. 69, no. 42018581–611
    [Google Scholar]
32. MastrangeloLisa S, TischioVictoria “Integrating Writing, Academic Discourses, and Service Learning: Project Renaissance and School/College Literacy Collaborations.” Composition Studies vol. 33, no. 1200531–53
    [Google Scholar]
33. MathieuPaulaTactics of Hope: The Public Turn in English Composition. Boynton/Cook, 2005
    [Google Scholar]
34. PineNancy “Service Learning in a Basic Writing Class: A Best Case Scenario.” Journal of Basic Writing vol. 27, no. 2200829–55
    [Google Scholar]
35. ReiffMary Jo, BawarshiAnis “Tracing Discursive Resources: How Students Use Prior Genre Knowledge to Negotiate New Writing Contexts in First-Year Composition.” Written Communication vol. 28, no. 32011312–37
    [Google Scholar]
36. RoozenKevin “Writing is a Social and Rhetorical Activity.” Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studiesedited byAdler-KassnerLinda, WardleElizabethUtah State University Press, 201517–19
    [Google Scholar]
37. ShahRachael W. “The Courage of Community Members: Community Perspectives of Engaged Pedagogies.” College Composition and Communication vol. 70, no. 1201882–110
    [Google Scholar]
38. WhiteStephanie “‘When It’s Outside of You’: Writing as Advocacy in First-Year Composition.” Pedagogy vol. 21, no. 1202127–54
    [Google Scholar]
39. WolfeJoanna, et al. “Knowing What We Know about Writing in the Disciplines: A New Approach to Teaching for Transfer in FYC.” WAC Journal vol. 25201442–77
    [Google Scholar]
40. WurrAdrian J. “Text-Based Measures of Service-Learning Writing Quality.” Reflections vol. 2, no. 2200240–55
    [Google Scholar]
41. YanceyKathleen Blake, et al. Writing Across Contexts: Transfer, Composition, and Sites of Writing. Utah State University Press, 2014
    [Google Scholar]
42. YanceyKathleen Blake, et al. “The Teaching for Transfer Curriculum: The Role of Concurrent Transfer and Inside- and Outside-School Contexts in Supporting Students’ Writing Development.” College Composition and Communication vol. 71, no. 22019268–95
    [Google Scholar]