Performing Data and Visualizing Difference: Developing a Performative Rhetoric of Infographics for the Writing Classroom

References

1. Alpers Svetlana The Art of Describing U of Chicago P 1983
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ball Cheryl E. et al. Writer/Designer: A Guide to Making Multimodal Projects. 2nd ed. Bedford/St. Martins 2018
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barad Karen Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke U P 2007
   [Google Scholar]
4. Battista Andrew Conte Jill “Teaching with Data: Visualization and Information as a Critical Process.” Critical Library Pedagogy Handbook, Volume Two: Lesson Plans PagowskyNicole McElroyKelly American Library Association 2016 pp. 147 154
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berger John Ways of Seeing BBC and Penguin 1972
   [Google Scholar]
6. Beveridge Aaron “Writing Through Big Data: New Challenges and Possibilities for Data-Driven Arguments.” Composition Forum 37 fall 2017 compositionforum.com/issue/37/big-data.php
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bitzer Lloyd F. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 25 1992 pp. 1 14 JSTOR www.jstor.org/stable/40237697
   [Google Scholar]
8. Braziller Amy Kleinfeld Elizabeth Bedford Book of Genres: A Guide and Reader. 2nd ed. e-book ed. Bedford/St. Martins 2018
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brooke Collin Gifford Lingua Fracta: Towards a Rhetoric of New Media Hampton Press 2009
   [Google Scholar]
10. Corum Jonathan “A Sharp Increase in ‘Sunny Day’ Flooding.” The New York Times 3 Sept 2016 www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/04/science/global-warming-increases-nuisanceflooding.html?searchResultPosition=1
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cosgrove Denis “Prospect, Perspective, and the Evolution of the Landscape Idea.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 10 1 1985 pp. 45 62
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cyphert Dale “Theorizing the Role of Big Data Visualization: Moving Visuals from Delivery to Invention.” Rhetorical Theory and Praxis in the Business Communication Classroom GetchellKristen M. LentzPaula J. Routledge 2019 pp. 161 185
    [Google Scholar]
13. Deaton Jeremy Landis Josh “Climate Change Is Creating An Affordable Housing Crisis in Miami.” NexusMedia 28 Aug 2018 www.nexus medianews.com/climate-change-iscreating-an-affordable-housing-crisisin-miami-38fd5b101c5e
    [Google Scholar]
14. DeLuca Kevin Michael “The Speed of Immanent Images: The Dangers of Reading Photographs.” Visual Communication: Perception, Rhetoric, and Technology HopeDiane S. Hampton Press 2006 pp. 79 90
    [Google Scholar]
15. Denchak Melissa “Flooding and Climate Change: Everything You Need to Know.” Our Stories National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) 10 Apr 2019 www.nrdc.org/stories/flooding-andclimate-change-everything-you-needknow
    [Google Scholar]
16. Drucker Johanna. “Non-Representational Approaches to Modeling Interpretation in a Graphical Environment.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33 2 2018 pp. 248 263
    [Google Scholar]
17. Edbauer Jenny “Unframing Models of Public Distribution: From Rhetorical Situation to Rhetorical Ecologies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35 4 fall 2005 pp. 5 24
    [Google Scholar]
18. Edgerton Samuel Y. The Heritage of Giotto’s Symmetry: Art and Science on the Eve of the Scientific Revolution Cornell U P 1991
    [Google Scholar]
19. Elkins James The Domain of Images. Cornell U P 1999
    [Google Scholar]
20. Elkins James The Poetics of Perspective. Cornell U P 1994
    [Google Scholar]
21. Eyman Douglas Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice. U Michigan P 2015 JSTOR https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65swm2
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ferster Bill Interactive Visualization: Insight Through Inquiry. MIT P 2013
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fleckenstein Kristie “Testifying: Seeing and Saying in World Making.” Ways of Seeing, Ways of Speaking: The Integration of Rhetoric and Vision in Constructing the Real FleckensteinKristie S. HumSue CalendrilloLinda T. Parlor Press 2007 pp. 3 30
    [Google Scholar]
24. Fleckenstein Kristie S. Gage Scott Bridgman Katherine “A Pedagogy of Rhetorical Looking: Atrocity Images at the Intersection of Vision and Violence.” College English 80 1 2017 pp. 11 34
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fleckenstein Kristie S. Hum Sue Calendrillo Linda T. Ways of Seeing, Ways of Speaking: The Integration of Rhetoric and Vision in Constructing the Real. Parlor Press 2007
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gallagher Chris W. “Being There: (Re) Making the Assessment Scene.” College Composition and Communication 62 3 2011 pp. 450 476
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ganesh Maya Indira Sobliye Gabi “Communicating Gender: The Challenges of Visualizing Information for Advocacy.” Diversity and Design: Understanding Hidden Consequences TaukeBeth SmithKorydon DavisCharles Routledge 2015 pp. 137 151
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gelman Andrew Unwin Antony “Infovis and Statistical Graphics: Different Goals, Different Looks.” Journal of Computational and Statistical Graphics 22 1 2013 pp. 2 28
    [Google Scholar]
29. George Diana “From Analysis to Design: Visual Communication in the Teaching of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 54 1 2002 pp. 11 39
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gitelman Lisa Jackson Virginia Introduction “Raw Data” Is An Oxymoron GitelmanLisa MIT P 2013 pp. 1 14
    [Google Scholar]
31. Gries Laurie E. Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics. Utah State U P 2015
    [Google Scholar]
32. Handa Carolyn Visual Rhetoric in a Digital World: A Critical Sourcebook. Bedford/St. Martins 2004
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hanson Valerie L. Haptic Visions: Rhetorics of Digital Images, Information, and Nanotechnology. Parlor Press 2015
    [Google Scholar]
34. Haraway Donna “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 3 autumn 1988 pp. 575 599 JSTOR, www.jstor.stable/3178066
    [Google Scholar]
35. Harvey David A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford U P 2007
    [Google Scholar]
36. Hullman Jessica Diakopoulos Nicholas “Visualization Rhetoric: Framing Effects in Narrative Visualization.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17 12 2011 pp. 2231 40
    [Google Scholar]
37. Ivins William Prints and Visual Communication. MIT P 1969
    [Google Scholar]
38. Jakobsson Catrin “Personal Choices to Reduce Your Contribution to Climate Change.” High-Impact Actions for Individuals to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions. www.kimnicholas.com/responding-to-climate-change.html 14 July 2021
    [Google Scholar]
39. Jay Martin Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought U of California P 1994
    [Google Scholar]
40. Johnson Jeremy David “Ethics, Agency, and Power: Toward an Algorithmic Rhetoric.” Theorizing Digital Rhetoric HessAaron DavissonAmber Routledge 2017 pp. 196 208
    [Google Scholar]
41. Keenan Jesse M. et al. “Climate Gentrification: From Theory to Empiricism in Miami-Dade County, Florida.” Environmental Research Letters 13 5 2018 www.iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb32
    [Google Scholar]
42. Kennedy Helen et al. “The Work That Visualization Conventions Do.” Information, Communication and Society 19 6 2016 pp. 715 735 White Rose Research Online http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/93521/
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kerschbaum Stephanie L. Towards a New Rhetoric of Difference. National Council of Teachers of English 2014
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kramer Kate “Visual Rhetoric: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Literature.” Visual Imagery, Metadata and Multimodal Literacies Across the Curriculum AugustAnita IGI Global 2018 pp. 1 23
    [Google Scholar]
45. Kress Gunther van Leeuwen Theo Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. Routledge 2006
    [Google Scholar]
46. Lanius Candice Hubbell Gaines S. “The New Data: Argumentation Amid, On, With, and In Data.” Theorizing Digital Rhetoric HessAaron DavissonAmber Routledge 2017 pp. 126 139
    [Google Scholar]
47. Long Seth “Visualizing Words and Knowledge: Arts of Memory for the Digital Age.” Computers and Composition 42 2016 pp. 28 46
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mazzei Patricia “Miami, Drowning and Scorching, Awaits Democrats for Debate.” The New York Times 24 June 2019 www.nytimes.com/2019/06/24/us/miami-democratic-debates.html
    [Google Scholar]
49. McCallum Lee “Modelling Score Variation in Student Writing with a Big Data System: Benefits, Challenges, and Ways Forward.” The Journal of Writing Analytics 3 2019 pp. 286 311
    [Google Scholar]
50. Mendenhall Annie S. Summers Sarah “Designing Research: Using Infographics to Teach Design Thinking in Composition.” Journal of Global Literacies, Technologies and Emerging Pedagogies 3 1 2015 pp. 359 371
    [Google Scholar]
51. Miller Carolyn R. “What Can Automation Tell Us About Agency?” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 37 2 2007 pp. 137 57
    [Google Scholar]
52. Miller Carolyn R. et al. “Genre: Permanence and Change.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 48 3 2018 pp. 269 277
    [Google Scholar]
53. Panofsky Erwin Perspective as Symbolic Form. Zone Books 1991
    [Google Scholar]
54. Pentzold Christian et al. “Imagining Big Data: Illustrations of ‘Big Data’ in US News Articles, 2010-2016.” New Media & Society 21 1 2018 pp. 139 167
    [Google Scholar]
55. Pinney Christopher Camera Indica: The Social Life of Indian Photographs. U of Chicago P 1998
    [Google Scholar]
56. Reyman Jessica “The Rhetorical Agency of Algorithms.” Theorizing Digital Rhetoric HessAaron DavissonAmber Routledge 2017 pp. 112 125
    [Google Scholar]
57. Shaviro Steven The Cinematic Body U of Minnesota P 1993
    [Google Scholar]
58. Silver Nate Introduction Best American Infographics 2014 Houghton Mifflin 2014 pp. xi xii
    [Google Scholar]
59. Snyder Joel “Picturing Vision.” Critical Inquiry 6 3 spring 1980 pp. 499 526 JSTOR www.jstor.org/stable/1343106
    [Google Scholar]
60. So Richard Jean Roland Edwin “Race and Distant Reading.” PMLA 135 1 2020 pp. 59 73
    [Google Scholar]
61. Stroupe Craig “Visualizing English: Recognizing the Hybrid Literacy of Visual and Verbal Authorship on the Web.” College English 62 5 2000 pp. 607 632
    [Google Scholar]
62. Sturken Marita Cartwright Lisa Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture 3rd ed. Oxford UP 2018
    [Google Scholar]
63. Tauke Beth Smith Korydon Davis Charles Introduction Diversity and Design: Understanding Hidden Consequences TaukeBeth SmithKorydon DavisCharles Routledge 2015 pp. 1 15
    [Google Scholar]
64. Toth Christopher “Revisiting a Genre: Teaching Infographics in Business and Professional Communication Courses.” Business Communication Quarterly 76 4 2013 pp. 446 457
    [Google Scholar]
65. Tufte Edward R. Beautiful Evidence. Graphics Press 2006
    [Google Scholar]
66. Walker Allison Smith Sellers Georgeanna “I See What You Mean: Using Data Visualization to Inspire Action Across Diverse Curricula.” Visual Imagery, Metadata, and Multimodal Literacies Across the Curriculum AugustAnita IGI Global 2018 pp. 145 181
    [Google Scholar]
67. Welch Kathleen E. Electric Rhetoric: Classical Rhetoric, Oralism, and a New Literacy. MIT P 1999
    [Google Scholar]
68. Wolfe Joanna “Teaching Students to Focus on the Data in Data Visualization.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 29 3 2015 pp. 344 359
    [Google Scholar]
69. Wolfe Joanna “Rhetorical Numbers: A Case for Quantitative Writing in the Composition Classroom.” College Composition and Communication 61 3 2010 pp. 452 475
    [Google Scholar]
70. Wynes Seth Nicholas Kimberly A. “The Climate Mitigation Gap: Education and Government Recommendations Miss the Most Effective Individual Actions.” Environmental Research Letters 12 7 2017 www.iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541
    [Google Scholar]
71. Wysocki Anne Frances Writing New Media: Theory and Applications for Expanding the Teaching of Composition. Utah State UP 2004
    [Google Scholar]