Skip to content
2018
Volume 72, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0010-096X
  • E-ISSN: 1939-9006

Abstract

We surveyed 803 undergraduates at a large public university about their online writing practices. We find that despite wide platform access, students typically write in a narrow range of spaces for limited purposes and audiences, with a majority expressing rhetorical concerns about writing in digital spaces. These findings suggest rich opportunities for writing instructors to better help students negotiate the terrain of online public discourse.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202030888
2020-09-01
2023-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aillerie Karine. Sarah McNicol. “Are Social Networking Sites Information Sources? Informational Purposes of High-School Students in Using SNSs. ” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 50 1 2018 10314
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allmer Thomas. Critical Theory and Social Media: Between Emancipation and Commodification Routledge 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson Monica. Jingjing Jiang. “Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018.” Pew Research Center 31 May 2018 https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2018/05/31102617/PI_2018.05.31_Teens Tech_FINAL.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauerlein Mark. The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future Tarcher/Penguin 2008
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baym Nancy K. Personal Connections in the Digital Age 2nd Polity 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beerits Laura. “Understanding I: The Rhetorical Variety of Self-References in College Literature Papers.” College Composition and Communication 67 4 2016 55075
    [Google Scholar]
  7. boyd danah. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites Routledge Zizi Papacharissi 2011 3958
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Branstetter Heather Lee. “Promiscuous Approaches to Reorienting Rhetorical Research.” Sexual Rhetorics: Methods, Identities, Publics Alexander Jonathan Rhodes Jacqueline Routledge 2016 1730
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bruns Axel. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage Peter Lang 2008
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Buck Amber. “Examining Digital Literacy Practices on Social Network Sites. ” Research in the Teaching of English 47 1 2012 938
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Carr Nicholas. The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains Norton 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Charney Davida. “Empiricism Is Not a Four-Letter Word.” College Composition and Communication 47 4 1996 56793
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chun Wendy Hui Kyong. Sarah Friedland. “Habits of Leaking: Of Sluts and Network Cards.” Differences 26 2 2015 128
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cote Amanda C. “‘I Can Defend Myself ’: Women’s Strategies for Coping with Harassment While Gaming Online.” Games and Culture 12 2 2017 13655
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DeLuca Katherine. “Shared Passions, Shared Compositions: Online Fandom Communities and Affinity Groups as Sites for Public Writing Pedagogy.” Computers and Composition 47 2018 7592
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dijck José van. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media Oxford UP 2013
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ervin Elizabeth. “Teaching Public Literacy: The Partisanship Problem.” College English 68 4 2006 40721
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gallagher Chris W. “What Writers Do: Behaviors, Behaviorism, and Writing Studies.” College Composition and Communication 68 2 2016 23865
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gallagher John R. “Five Strategies Internet Writers Use to ‘Continue the Conversation.’” Written Communication 32 4 2015 396425
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Giroux Henry A. “Selfie Culture in the Age of Corporate and State Surveillance.” Third Text 29 3 2015 15564
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gold David. Merideth Garcia. Anna Knutson. “Going Public in an Age of Digital Anxiety: How Students Negotiate the Topoi of Online Writing Environments.” Composition Forum 41 Spring 2019 http://compositionforum.com/issue/41/going-public.php
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gottfried Jeffrey. Elisa Shearer. “News Use across Social Media Platforms 2016.” Pew Research Center 26 May 2016 https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/05/PJ_2016.05.26_social-media-and-news_FINAL-1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Greenwood Shannon. Andrew Perrin Maeve Duggan. “Social Media Update 2016.” Pew Research Center 11 Nov 2016 https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2016/11/10132827/PI_2016.11.11_Social-Media-Update_FINAL.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gruwell Leigh. “Wikipedia’s Politics of Exclusion: Gender, Epistemology, and Feminist Rhetorical (In)action.” Computers and Composition 37 2015 11731
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gruwell Leigh. “Writing against Harassment: Public Writing Pedagogy and Online Hate.” Composition Forum 36 Summer 2017 http://compositionforum.com/issue/36/against-harassment.php
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hansen Kristine. “Are We There Yet? The Making of a Discipline in Composition.” The Changing of Knowledge in Composition: Contemporary Perspectives Massey Lance Gebhardt Richard C. Utah State UP 2011 23663
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hargittai Eszter. Heather Young. “Searching for a ‘Plan B’: Young Adults’ Strategies for Finding Information about Emergency Contraception Online.” Policy & Internet 4 2 2012 123
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hargittai Eszter. Yuli Patrick Hsieh. “Succinct Survey Measures of Web Use Skills.” Social Science Computer Review 30 1 2012 95107
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Haswell Richard H. “Quantitative Methods in Composition Studies: An Introduction to Their Functionality.” Writing Studies Research in Practice: Methods and Methodologies Nickoson Lee Sheridan Mary P. Southern Illinois UP 2012 18596
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hendriks Carolyn M. Sonya Duus Selen A. Ercan. “Performing Politics on Social Media: The Dramaturgy of an Environmental Controversy on Facebook.” Environmental Politics 25 6 2016 110225
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hill Benjamin Mako. “Editor-to-Reader Ratios on Wikipedia.” Copyrighteous 6 Feb 2011 https://mako.cc/copyrighteous/editor-to-reader-ratios-onwikipedia
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ito Mizuko. et al. Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media MIT P 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Klein Adam. Fanaticism, Racism, and Rage Online: Corrupting the Digital Sphere Palgrave Macmillan 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lancaster Zak. “Do Academics Really Write This Way? A Corpus Investigation of Moves and Templates in They Say/I SayCollege Composition and Communication 67 3 2016 43764
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Litt Eden. Eszter Hargittai. “The Imagined Audience on Social Network Sites.” Social Media + Society 2 1 2016 112
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Livingstone Sonia. “Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies.” Communication Review 7 1 2004 314
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lorenz Taylor. “Teens Are Debating the News on Instagram: More Teenagers Are Getting Their Information from So-Called Flop Accounts.” Atlantic 26 July 2018 https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/07/the-instagram-forums-where-teens-go-to-debate-big-issues/566153/
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mackiewicz Jo. “The Co-Construction of Credibility in Online Product Reviews.” Technical Communication Quarterly 19 4 2010 40326
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Margaryan Anoush. Allison Littlejohn Gabrielle Vojt. “Are Digital Natives a Myth or Reality? University Students’ Use of Digital Technologies.” Computers & Education 56 2011 42940
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Marwick Alice E. danah boyd. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13 1 2010 11433
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Marwick Alice E. danah boyd. “Networked Privacy: How Teenagers Negotiate Context in Social Media.” New Media & Society 16 7 2014 105167
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Matei Sorin Adam. Brian C. Britt. Structural Differentiation in Social Media: Adhocracy, Entropy, and the “1% Effect.” Springer 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Mayer-Schönberger Viktor. Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age Princeton UP 2011
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Meloncon Lisa. Kirk St.Amant. “Empirical Research in Technical and Professional Communication: A 5-Year Examination of Research Methods and a Call for Research Sustainability.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 49 2 2019 12855
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Mendelson Andrew L. Zizi Papacharissi. “Look at Us: Collective Narcissism in College Student Facebook Photo Galleries.” A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites Papacharissi Zizi Routledge 2011 25173
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Moore Jessie L. et al. “Revisualizing Composition: How First-Year Writers Use Composing Technologies.” Computers and Composition 39 2016 113
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Mueller Derek. “Grasping Rhetoric and Composition by Its Long Tail: What Graphs Can Tell Us about the Field’s Changing Shape.” College Composition and Communication 64 1 2012 195223
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Papacharissi Zizi. “The Virtual Sphere 2.0: The Internet, the Public Sphere, and Beyond.” Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics Chadwick Andrew Howard Philip N. Routledge 2009 23045
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Papacharissi Zizi. Emily Easton. “In the Habitus of the New: Structure, Agency, and the Social Media Habitus.” A Companion to New Media Dynamics Hartley John Burgess Jean Bruns Axel Blackwell 2013 17184
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Pew Research Center “Millennials & Political News.” Pew Research Center 1 June 2015 https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2015/06/Millennials-and-News-FINAL-7-27-15.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Pigg Stacey. et al. “Ubiquitous Writing, Technologies, and the Social Practice of Literacies of Coordination.” Written Communication 31 1 2014 91117
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Pittman Matthew. Brandon Reich. “Social Media and Loneliness: Why an Instagram Picture May Be Worth More than a Thousand Twitter Words.” Computers in Human Behavior 62 2016 15567
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Ronson Jon. So You’ve Been Publicly Shamed Riverhead 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Shanahan Marie K. Journalism, Online Comments, and the Future of Public Discourse Routledge 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Shirky Clay. Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age Penguin 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Sundvall Scott. Katherine Fredlund. “The Writing on the Wall: Activist Rhetorics, Public Writing, and Responsible Pedagogy.” Composition Forum 36 Summer 2017 http://compositionforum.com/issue/36/writing-wall.php
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Thompson Penny. “The Digital Natives as Learners: Technology Use Patterns and Approaches to Learning.” Computers & Education 65 2013 1233
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Tomlinson Elizabeth. “First Encounters in Professional Cyberspace: Writers’ Exploration of LinkedIn.” Literacy in Practice: Writing in Private, Public, and Working Lives Thomas Patrick Takayoshi Pamela Rout-ledge 2016 16375
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Vetter Matthew A. “Teaching Wikipedia: Appalachian Rhetoric and the Encyclopedic Politics of Representation.” College English 80 5 2018 397422
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Wolfe Joanna. “Rhetorical Numbers: A Case for Quantitative Writing in the Composition Classroom.” College Composition and Communication 61 3 2010 45275
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Yancey Kathleen Blake. “Made Not Only in Words: Composition in a New Key.” College Composition and Communication 56 2 2004 297328
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Yancey Kathleen Blake. Writing in the 21st Century: A Report from the National Council of Teachers of English National Council of Teachers of English 2009 https://ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Press/Yancey_final.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202030888
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202030888
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error