Symposium: Standardization, Democratization, and Writing Programs

References

1. Adler-KassnerLindaElizabethWardleNaming What We KnowUtah State UP2015
   [Google Scholar]
2. BurkeKennethThe Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action3rdU of California P1973
   [Google Scholar]
3. Council of Writing Program Administrators“WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition.”WPA: Writing Program Administration231-219995963
   [Google Scholar]
4. Council of Writing Program Administrators“WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition (3.0).”2014http://wpacouncil.org/positions/outcomes.htmlAccessed 5 July 2017
5. Council of Writing Program Administrators, National Council of Teachers of English, and National Writing Project“Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing.”2011http://wpacouncil.org/frameworkAccessed 5 July 2017
6. Darling-HammondLindaThe Right to Learn: A Blueprint for Creating Schools That WorkJossey-Bass1997
   [Google Scholar]
7. DeweyJohnDemocracy and EducationFree P1997
   [Google Scholar]
8. DownsDouglasElizabethWardle“Teaching about Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning ‘First-Year Composition’ as ‘Introduction to Writing Studies.’”College Composition and Communication584200755284
   [Google Scholar]
9. ElbowPeter“A Friendly Challenge to Push the Outcomes Statement Further.”Harringtonet al.17790
   [Google Scholar]
10. GallagherChris W.“Assess Locally, Validate Globally: Heuristics for Validating Local Writing Assessments.”WPA Journal34120101032
    [Google Scholar]
11. GallagherChris W.“Disrupting the Game-Changer: Remembering the History of Competency-Based Education.”Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning46620141623
    [Google Scholar]
12. GallagherChris W.“Our Trojan Horse: Outcomes Assessment and the Resurrection of Competency-Based Education.”Composition in the Age of AusterityWelchNancyScottTonyUtah State UP20162134
    [Google Scholar]
13. GallagherChris W.Reclaiming Assessment: A Better Alternative to the Accountability AgendaHeinemann2007
    [Google Scholar]
14. “The Trouble with Outcomes: Pragmatic Inquiry and Educational Aims.”College English75120124260
    [Google Scholar]
15. GraffGerald“Assessment Changes Everything.”MLA Newsletter401200834
    [Google Scholar]
16. GallagherChris W.Clueless in Academe: How Schooling Obscures the Life of the MindYale UP2004
    [Google Scholar]
17. GallagherChris W.“Our Undemocratic Curriculum.”Profession2007128135
    [Google Scholar]
18. GallagherChris W.Professing Literature: An Institutional HistoryU of Chicago P1989
    [Google Scholar]
19. GraffGeraldCathyBirkenstein“A Progressive Case for Educational StandardizationAcademe94320081316
    [Google Scholar]
20. GraffGeraldCathyBirkensteinThey Say/I SayNorton2014
    [Google Scholar]
21. HarringtonSusanmarieet al.The Outcomes Book: Debate and Consensus after the WPA Outcomes StatementUtah State UP2005
    [Google Scholar]
22. McNeilLindaContradictions of School Reform: Educational Costs of Standardized TestingRoutledge2000
    [Google Scholar]
23. MeierDeborahIn Schools We Trust: Creating Communities of Learning in an Era of Testing and StandardizationBeacon P2002
    [Google Scholar]
24. PhelpsLouise WetherbeeJohnM. Ackerman“Making the Case for Disciplinarity in Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing Studies: The Visibility Project.”College Composition and Communication6212010180215
    [Google Scholar]
25. WhiteEdward“The Origins of the Outcomes Statement.”Harringtonet al.37
    [Google Scholar]