Researching Writing Program Administration Expertise in Action: A Case Study of Collaborative Problem Solving as Transdisciplinary Practice

References

1. Anderson Paul et al. “The Contributions of Writing to Learning and Development: Results from a Large-Scale Multi-Institutional Study.” Research in the Teaching of English 50 2 2015 199235
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bishop Karen. “On the Road to (Documentary) Reality: Capturing the Intellectual and Political Process of Writing Program Administration.” The Writing Program Administrator as Theorist: Making Knowledge Work Rose Shirley K. Weiser Irwin Boynton/Cook 2002 4253
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bizzell Patricia. “Foreword: On Good Administrators.” George viiix
   [Google Scholar]
4. Braddock Richard et al. Research in Written Composition National Council of Teachers of English 1963
   [Google Scholar]
5. Charlton Colin et al. GenAdmin: Theorizing WPA Identities in the Twenty-First Century Parlor P 2011
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clark Wallace et al. The Gantt Chart: A Working Tool of Management Ronald P 1922
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cooper Charles R. Lee Odell Research on Composing: Points of Departure National Council of Teachers of English 1978
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cox Michelle et al. Sustainable WAC: A Whole Systems Approach to Launching and Developing Writing Across the Curriculum Programs National Council of Teachers of English 2018
   [Google Scholar]
9. Di Iacovo Francesco et al. “Measuring the Effects of Transdisciplinary Research: The Case of a Social Farming Project.” Futures 75 2016 2435
   [Google Scholar]
10. George Diana Kitchen Cooks, Plate Twirlers & Troubadours: Writing Program Administrators Tell Their Stories Boynton/Cook 1999
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gere Anne Ruggles et al. “Interrogating Disciplines/Disciplinarity in WAC/ WID: An Institutional Study.” College Composition and Communication 67 2 2015 24366
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gibbons Michael. “Higher Education Relevance in the 21st Century.” UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education Oct 1998 ERIC ED453721
    [Google Scholar]
13. Graff Nelson. “‘An Effective and Agonizing Way to Learn’: Backwards Design and New Teachers’ Preparation for Planning Curriculum.” Teacher Education Quarterly 38 3 2011 15168
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hairston Maxine. “The Winds of Change: Thomas Kuhn and the Revolution in the Teaching of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 33 1 1982 7688
    [Google Scholar]
15. Halpern Faye. “Strategic Disingenuousness: The WPA, the ‘Scribbling Women,’ and the Problem of Expertise.” College Composition and Communication 66 4 2015 64367
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hart-Davidson William et al. “Visualizing Writing Activity as Knowledge Work: Challenges & Opportunities.” Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication [SIGDOC] ACM 2006
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hult Christine et al. Portland Resolution Committee “The Portland Resolution.” WPA: Writing Program Administration 16 1-2 1992 8894
    [Google Scholar]
18. Janangelo Joseph Kristine Hansen. Preface Resituating Writing: Constructing and Administering Writing Programs Janangelo Joseph Hansen Kristine Boynton/Cook 1995 xvxix
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lauer Janice M. “Composition Studies: Dappled Discipline.” Rhetoric Review 3 1 1984 2029
    [Google Scholar]
20. LeFevre Karen Burke Invention as a Social Act Southern Illinois UP 1987
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mara Andrew. “Pedagogical Approaches: Using Charettes to Perform Civic Engagement in Technical Communication Classrooms and Workplaces.” Technical Communication Quarterly 15 2 2006 21536
    [Google Scholar]
22. Marcovich Anne Terry Shinn. “Where Is Disciplinarity Going? Meeting on the Borderland.” Studies of Science and Technology 50 3-4 2011 582606
    [Google Scholar]
23. Miller Carolyn Jack Selzer. “Special Topics of Argument in Engineering Reports.” Writing in Nonacademic Settings Odell Lee Goswami Dixie Guilford 1985 30941
    [Google Scholar]
24. Mobjörk Malin “Consulting versus Participatory Transdisciplinarity: A Refined Classification of Transdisciplinary Research.” Futures 42 8 2010 86673
    [Google Scholar]
25. North Stephen M. The Making of Knowledge in Composition: Portrait of an Emerging Field Boynton/Cook 1987
    [Google Scholar]
26. Parker Jan “A New Disciplinarity: Communities of Knowledge, Learning and Practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 7 4 2002 37386
    [Google Scholar]
27. Phelps Louise Wetherbee Composition as a Human Science: Contributions to the Self-Understanding of a Discipline Oxford UP 1988
    [Google Scholar]
28. Phelps Louise Wetherbee John M. Ackerman “Making the Case for Disciplinarity in Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing Studies: The Visibility Project.” The Future of Rhetoric and Composition special issue of College Composition and Communication 62 1 2010 180215
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rademaekers Justin K. “Is WAC/WID Ready for the Transdisciplinary Research University?” Across the Disciplines 12 2 2015 http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/articles/ rademaekers2015.cfm
    [Google Scholar]
30. Smagorinsky Peter Teaching English by Design: How to Create and Carry Out Instructional Units Heinemann 2007
    [Google Scholar]
31. Tarabochia Sandra L. “Negotiating Expertise: A Pedagogical Framework for Cross-Curricular Literacy Work.” WPA: Writing Program Administration 36 2 2013 11741
    [Google Scholar]
32. Vidali Amy “Disabling Writing Program Administration.” Writing Program Administration Journal 38 2 2015 3255
    [Google Scholar]
33. Wernli Didier Frédéric Darbellay “Interdisciplinarity and the 21st Century Research-Intensive University.” League of European Research Universities Sept 2016 https:// www.leru.org/files/Interdisciplinarityand-the-21st-Century-Research-Intensive-University-Full-paper.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
34. Wiggins Grant Jay McTighe Understanding by Design Prentice Hall 2005
    [Google Scholar]
35. Writing Faculty Core Committee “Page 1 of Advanced Writing Proposed Syllabi.” Core Curriculum Santa Clara University 2015