Skip to content
2018
Volume 70, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0010-096X
  • E-ISSN: 1939-9006
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

This article offers a genealogy of the deliberative policymaking of the WPA Outcomes Statement 3.0 Revision Task Force. Interviews with Task Force members reveal that the revised statement presents , , and as “boundary objects,” in order to preserve the document’s for as long as possible.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ccc201829784
2018-09-01
2024-04-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ccc/70/1/collegecompositionandcommunication29784.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.58680/ccc201829784&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Asen Robert Democracy, Deliberation, and Education Penn State UP 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Behm Nicholas N. et al. editors. The WPA Outcomes Statement—A Decade Later Parlor Press 2013
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowker Geoffrey Susan Leigh Star Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences MIT P 1999
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brunk-Chavez Beth Personal interview 9 June 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Council of Writing Program Administrators “WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition.” The Outcomes Book: Debate and Consensus after the WPA Outcomes Statement edited by Harrington Susanmarie et al. Utah State UP 2005
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Council of Writing Program Administrators “WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition.” The WPA Outcomes Statement: A Decade Later edited by Behm Nicholas N. et al. Parlor Press 2013 305 09
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Council of Writing Program Administrators “WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition (3.0), Approved July 17, 2014.” Council of Writing Program Administrators 17 July 2014 www.wpacouncil.org/positions/outcomes
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dryer Dylan Personal interview 27 Apr 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dryer Dylan et al. “Revising FYC Outcomes for a Multimodal, Digitally Composed World: The WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition.” Writing Program Administration 38 1 2014 129 43
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Emad Gholamreza Wolff-Michael Roth “Policy as Boundary Object: A New Way to Look at Educational Policy Design and Implementation.” Vocations and Learning 2 19 2009 19 35 10.1007/s12186‑008‑9015‑0
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ericsson Patricia “Beyond the Laments, beyond the Boundaries: Communicating about Composition.” Diss Michigan Technological U 2003
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault Michel “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” The Foucault Reader edited by Rabinow Paul Pantheon Books 1984 76 100
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gallagher Chris “What Is Policy?” A Rhetoric for Writing Program Administrators edited by Malenczyk Rita Parlor P 2013 346 56
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Halbritter Bump Personal interview 30 May 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Harrington Susanmarie Personal interview 19 May 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Harrington Susanmarie et al. editors The Outcomes Book: Debate and Consensus after the Outcomes Statement Utah State UP 2005
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Huvila Isto “The Politics of Boundary Objects: Hegemonic Interventions and the Making of a Document.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 12 2011 2529 39 10.1002/asi.21639.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu Barbara L. “More than the Latest PC Buzzword for Modes: What Genre Theory Means to Composition.” The Outcomes Book: Debate and Consensus after the WPA Outcomes Statement edited by Harrington Susanmarie et al. Utah State UP 2005 72 84
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Odell Lee et al. “The Discourse-Based Interview: A Procedure for Exploring the Tacit Knowledge of Writers in Nonacademic Settings.” Research on Writing: Principles and Methods edited by Mosenthal Peter et al. Longman 1983 220 35
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rice Jeff “Conservative Writing Program Administrators (WPAs).” The Writing Program Interrupted: Making Space for Critical Discourse edited by Strickland Donna Gunner Jeanne Boynton/Cook 2009 1 13
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Shipka Jody Toward a Composition Made Whole U of Pittsburgh P 2011
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Star Susan Leigh “Cooperation without Consensus in Scientific Problem Solving: Dynamics of Closure in Open Systems.” CSCW: Cooperation or Conflict? edited by Easterbrook Steve Springer-Verlag 1993 93 106
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Star Susan Leigh Geoffrey Bowker “Enacting Silence: Residual Categories as a Challenge for Ethics, Information Systems, and Communication.” Ethics and Information Technology 9 2007 273 89 10.1007/S10676‑007‑9141‑7
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Star Susan Leigh Griesemer James R. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Boundary Objects and Beyond: Working with Leigh Star edited by Bowker Geoffrey et al. MIT P 2015 171 200
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Weick Karl Sensemaking in Organizations SAGE 1995
    [Google Scholar]
  26. White Edward M. et al. Very Like a Whale: The Assessment of Writing Programs UP of Colorado 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Yancey Kathleen Blake Personal interview 17 Aug 2015
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ccc201829784
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error