Writing in Social Worlds: An Argument for Researching Composing Processes

References

1. AldrichPearl G.“Adult Writers: Some Reasons for Ineffective Writing on the Job.”College Composition and Communication333198228487
   [Google Scholar]
2. BeachRichard“Self-Evaluation Strategies of Extensive Revisers and Nonrevisers.”College Composition and Communication272197616064
   [Google Scholar]
3. BeanJohn C.“Computerized Word-Processing as an Aid to Revision.”College Composition and Communication342198314648
   [Google Scholar]
4. BereiterCarlScardamaliaMarleneThe Psychology of Written Composition.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates1987
   [Google Scholar]
5. BerkenkotterCarol“Decisions and Revisions: The Planning Strategies of a Publishing Writer.”College Composition and Communication342198315669
   [Google Scholar]
6. BerkenkotterCarol“Student Writers and Their Sense of Authority over Texts.”College Composition and Communication353198431219
   [Google Scholar]
7. BerkenkotterCarol“Understanding a Writer’s Awareness of Audience.”College Composition and Communication324198138899
   [Google Scholar]
8. BizzellPatriciaAcademic Discourse and Critical Consciousness.U of Pittsburgh P1992
   [Google Scholar]
9. BerkenkotterCarol“Cognition, Convention, and Certainty: What We Need to Know about Writing.”Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Readeredited byVillanuevaVictor2nd edNCTE2003387412
   [Google Scholar]
10. BlauSheridan“Invisible Writing: Investigating Cognitive Processes in Composition.”College Composition and Communication3431983297312
    [Google Scholar]
11. BoiceRobert“The Neglected Third Factor in Writing: Productivity.”College Composition and Communication364198547280
    [Google Scholar]
12. BrandtDeborah“Struggles for Perspective: A Commentary on ‘One Story of Many to Be Told’: Following Empirical Studies of College and Adult Writing through 100 Years of NCTE Journals.”Research in the Teaching of English462201121014
    [Google Scholar]
13. BrandtDeborahClintonKatieAfterwordTravel Notes from the New Literacy Studies: Instances of Practiceedited byPahlKateRowsellJenniferMultilingual Matters200625458
    [Google Scholar]
14. BreuchLee-Ann M. Kastman“Post Process ‘Pedagogy’: A Philosophical Exercise.”JAC221200211950
    [Google Scholar]
15. BuckAmber“Physically Present and Digitally Active: Locating Ecologies of Writing on Social Networks.”Literacy in Practice: Writing in Working, Private, and Public Livesedited byThomasPatrickTakayoshiPamelaRoutledge201686102
    [Google Scholar]
16. CaseDonald“Processing Professorial Words: Personal Computers and the Writing Habits of University.”College Composition and Communication363198531722
    [Google Scholar]
17. CatanoJames“Computer-Based Writing: Navigating the Fluid Text.”College Composition and Communication363198530916
    [Google Scholar]
18. ClarkBeverly LyonWiedenhauptSonja“On Blocking and Unblocking Sonja: A Case Study in Two Voices.”College Composition and Communication43119925574
    [Google Scholar]
19. CollierRichard M.“The Word Processor and Revision Strategies.”College Composition and Communication342198314955
    [Google Scholar]
20. CooperCharles R.OdellLeeResearch on Composing: Points of Departure.National Council of Teachers of English1978
    [Google Scholar]
21. CooperMarilynHolzmanMichael“Talking about Protocols.”College Composition and Communication343198328493
    [Google Scholar]
22. CrowleySharon“Components of the Composing Process.”College Composition and Communication282197716669
    [Google Scholar]
23. DaiuteColette A.“The Computer as Stylus and Audience.”College Composition and Communication342198313445
    [Google Scholar]
24. de BeaugrandeRobert“Moving from Product toward Process.”College Composition and Communication304197935763
    [Google Scholar]
25. EmigJanetThe Composing Processes of Twelfth Graders.National Council of Teachers of English1971NCTE Research Report13
    [Google Scholar]
26. FaigleyLesterHansenKristine“Learning to Write in the Social Sciences.”College Composition and Communication362198514049
    [Google Scholar]
27. FaigleyLesterWitteStephen“Analyzing Revision.”College Composition and Communication324198140014
    [Google Scholar]
28. FlowerLinda“Cognition, Context, and Theory Building.”College Composition and Communication4031989282311
    [Google Scholar]
29. FlowerLinda“Writer-Based Prose: A Cognitive Basis for Problems in Writing.”College English41119791937
    [Google Scholar]
30. FlowerLindaHayesJohn R.“The Cognition of Discovery: Defining a Rhetorical Problem.”College Composition and Communication31119802132
    [Google Scholar]
31. FlowerLindaHayesJohn R.“A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing.”College Composition and Communication324198136587
    [Google Scholar]
32. FlowerLindaHayesJohn R.“Identifying the Organization Writing Processes.”Cognitive Processes in Writingedited byGreggLee W.SteinbergEdwin R.Routledge1980330
    [Google Scholar]
33. FlowerLindaHayesJohn R.“Images, Plans, and Prose: The Representation of Meaning in Writing.”Written Communication11198412060
    [Google Scholar]
34. FlowerLindaHayesJohn R.“Problem-Solving Strategies and the Writing Process.”College English394197744961
    [Google Scholar]
35. FlowerLindaet al.“Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision.”College Composition and Communication37119861655
    [Google Scholar]
36. FlynnElizabeth A.“Composing Responses to Literary Texts: A Process Approach.”College Composition and Communication343198334248
    [Google Scholar]
37. GravesRichard L.“Levels of Skill in the Composing Process.”College Composition and Communication293197822732
    [Google Scholar]
38. GreggLee W.SteinbergEdwin R.editorsCognitive Processes in Writing.Routledge1980
    [Google Scholar]
39. HarrisJeanette“Student Writers and Word Processing: A Preliminary Evaluation.”College Composition and Communication363198532330
    [Google Scholar]
40. HawisherGailet al.Computers and the Teaching of Writing in American Higher Education, 1979–1994: A History.Ablex1995
    [Google Scholar]
41. HayesJohnFlowerLinda“Writing Research and the Writer.”American Psychologist41101986110613
    [Google Scholar]
42. HumesAnn“Research on the Composing Process.”Review of Educational Research532198320116
    [Google Scholar]
43. JensenGeorge H.DiTiberioJohn K.“Personality and Individual Writing Processes.”College Composition and Communication3531984285300
    [Google Scholar]
44. KentThomaseditorPost-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process ParadigmSouthern Illinois UP1999
    [Google Scholar]
45. KingMartha“Research in Composition: A Need for Theory.”Research in the Teaching of English1231978193202
    [Google Scholar]
46. KnoblauchC. H.“Intentionality in the Writing Process: A Case Study.”College Composition and Communication312198015359
    [Google Scholar]
47. McCarthyPatriciaet al.“Self-Efficacy and Writing: A Different View of Self-Evaluation.”College Composition and Communication364198546571
    [Google Scholar]
48. McKeeHeidi A.Nicole De-VossDanielleeditorsDigital Writing Research: Technologies, Methodologies and Ethical IssuesHampton Press2007
    [Google Scholar]
49. MillerSusan“How Writers Evaluate Their Own Writing.”College Composition and Communication332198217683
    [Google Scholar]
50. MurrayDonald M.“Response of a Laboratory Rat—or, Being Protocoled.”College Composition and Communication342198316972
    [Google Scholar]
51. NelsonJennie“Reading Classrooms as Text: Exploring Student Writers’ Interpretive Practices.”College Composition and Communication463199541129
    [Google Scholar]
52. NickosonLeeSheridanMary P.editorsWriting Studies Research in Practice: Methods and MethodologiesSouthern Illinois UP2012
    [Google Scholar]
53. OdellLee“The Process of Writing and the Process of Learning.”College Composition and Communication31119804250
    [Google Scholar]
54. OlsonGary A.“Toward a Post-Process Composition: Abandoning the Rhetoric of Assertion.”Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigmedited byKentThomasSouthern Illinois UP1999715
    [Google Scholar]
55. PenroseAnn M.GeislerCheryl“Reading and Writing without Authority.”College Composition and Communication454199450520
    [Google Scholar]
56. PerlSondra“Understanding Composing.”College Composition and Communication314Dec198036369
    [Google Scholar]
57. PetersonLinda“Repetition and Metaphor in the Early Stages of Composing.”College Composition and Communication364198542943
    [Google Scholar]
58. PiankoSharon“Reflection: A Critical Component of the Composing Process.”College Composition and Communication303197927578
    [Google Scholar]
59. PiggStacey“Researching Social Media Literacies as Emergent Practice: Changes in Twitter Use after Year Two of a Longitudinal Case Study.”Literacy in Practice: Writing in Working, Private, and Public Livesedited byThomasPatrickTakayoshiPamelaRoutledge20161731
    [Google Scholar]
60. PorterJames E.ForewordDigital Writing Research: Technologies, Methodologies and Ethical Issuesedited byMcKeeHeidiDeVossDanielleHampton P2007xiiix
    [Google Scholar]
61. PowellKatrinaTakayoshiPamelaeditorsPracticing Research in Writing Studies: Reflexive and Ethically Responsible ResearchHampton P2012
    [Google Scholar]
62. PriorPaul“Tracing Process: How Texts Come into Being.”What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practicesedited byBazermanCharlesPriorPaulLawrence Erlbaum Associates2004167200
    [Google Scholar]
63. RhodesJacquelineAlexanderJonathan“Reimagining the Social Turn: New Work from the Field.”College English766201448187
    [Google Scholar]
64. RobertsCharles W.“Editorial Comment.”College Composition and Communication11195013
    [Google Scholar]
65. RodriguesDawn“Computers and Basic Writers.”College Composition and Communication363198533639
    [Google Scholar]
66. RohmanGordon“Pre-Writing: The Stage of Discovery in the Writing Process.”College Composition and Communication162196510612
    [Google Scholar]
67. RoseMike“Rigid Rules, Inflexible Plans, and the Stifling of Language: A Cognitivist Analysis of Writer’s Block.”College Composition and Communication3141980389401
    [Google Scholar]
68. RoysterJacqueline JonesKirschGesaFeminist Rhetorical Practices: New Horizons for Rhetoric, Composition Studies, and Literacy StudiesSouthern Illinois UP2012
    [Google Scholar]
69. RubinLois“Exploration of the Writing Experience: A Way to Improve Composing.”College Composition and Communication343198334955
    [Google Scholar]
70. SanchezRaulThe Function of Theory in Composition StudiesState U of New York P2006
    [Google Scholar]
71. SchwartzMimi“Two Journeys through the Writing Process.”College Composition and Communication3421983188201
    [Google Scholar]
72. SelzerJack“The Composing Processes of an Engineer.”College Composition and Communication342198317887
    [Google Scholar]
73. ShaughnessyMina“Some Needed Research on Writing.”College Composition and Communication284197731720
    [Google Scholar]
74. SkubikowskiKathleenElderJohn“Word Processing in a Community of Writers.”College Composition and Communication3821987198201
    [Google Scholar]
75. SmagorinskyPeter“The Reliability and Validity of Protocol Analysis.”Written Communication64198946379
    [Google Scholar]
76. SommersNancy“The Need for Theory in Composition Research.”College Composition and Communication30119794649
    [Google Scholar]
77. SommersNancy“Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers.”College Composition and Communication314198037888
    [Google Scholar]
78. StreetBrianLiteracy in Theory and PracticeCambridge UP1984
    [Google Scholar]
79. SullivanPatriciaPorterJamesOpening Spaces: Writing Technologies and Critical Research PracticesAblex1997
    [Google Scholar]
80. TakayoshiPamela“Methodological Challenges to Researching Composing Processes in a New Literacy Context.”Literacy in Composition Studies41March2016123
    [Google Scholar]
81. TakayoshiPamela“Short-Form Writing: Studying Process in the Context of Contemporary Composing Technologies.”Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing372015113
    [Google Scholar]
82. TrimburJohn“Taking the Social Turn: Teaching Writing Post-Process.”College Composition and Communication451199410818
    [Google Scholar]
83. TroykaLynn Quitman“The Pulse of the Profession.”College Composition and Communication312198022731
    [Google Scholar]
84. WitteStephen“Pre-Text and Composing.”College Composition and Communication3841987397425
    [Google Scholar]
85. WitteStephen“Topical Structure and Revision: An Exploratory Study.”College Composition and Communication343198331341
    [Google Scholar]
86. WitteStephen“Toward a Model for Research in Written Composition.”Research in the Teaching of English14119807381
    [Google Scholar]