Review: Rhetorical Analysis of Scientific Texts: Three Major Contributions | ncte.org

2018

Volume 46, Issue 2

ISSN: 0010-096X
E-ISSN: 1939-9006

Review: Rhetorical Analysis of Scientific Texts: Three Major Contributions
Author(s): Mary M. Lay
Source: College Composition & Communication, Volume 46, Issue 2, May 1995, p. 292 - 302
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc19958747
- Published online: 01 May 1995

Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

© 1995 by the National Council of Teachers of English

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ccc19958747

1995-05-01

2026-06-15

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ccc19958747

Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

- A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing
  
  Author(s): Linda Flower and John R. Hayes
- The Place of World Englishes in Composition: Pluralization Continued
  
  Author(s): A. Suresh Canagarajah
- Ways of Knowing, Doing, and Writing in the Disciplines
  
  Author(s): Michael Carter
- Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse
  
  Author(s): William Vande Kopple
- Writing as a Mode of Learning
  
  Author(s): Janet Emig
- Teaching about Writing, Righting Misconceptions:
  
  Author(s): Douglas Downs and Elizabeth Wardle
- Rhetorical Sovereignty: What Do American Indians Want from Writing?
  
  Author(s): Scott Richard Lyons
- Rhetorical Agency as Emergent and Enacted
  
  Author(s): Marilyn M. Cooper
- Analyzing Revision
  
  Author(s): Lester Faigley and Stephen Witte
- The Movement of Air, the Breath of Meaning: Aurality and Multimodal Composing
  
  Author(s): Cynthia L. Selfe
More Less

This is a required field

Please enter a valid email address

Approval was a Success

Invalid data

An Error Occurred

Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error

Please enter a valid_number test