Skip to content
2018
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Middle school science students participate in academic discourse centered around relevant and current controversial topics. Students engage in critical thinking and develop active listening skills.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.2307/languagearts.32025
2022-09-01
2024-02-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Callard C. H. Foster E. S. Kruger J. S. 2020 How tech can build teams when learning moves online, the right combination of tools can build collaboration The Learning Professional 41 4 46 54
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Henderson B. J. MacPherson A. Osborne J. Wild A. 2015 Beyond construction: Five arguments for the role and value of critique in learning science International Journal of Science Education 37 10 1668 98
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Newton P. Driver R. Osborne J. 1999 The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science International Journal of Science Education 21 553 76
    [Google Scholar]
  4. von Aufschnaiter C. Erduran S. Osborne J. Simon S. 2008 Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 1 101 31
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.2307/languagearts.32025
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error